Search found 3 matches
- Wed Aug 23, 2017 2:32 pm
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: Changed Hostnames; still "Down"
- Replies: 0
- Views: 376
Changed Hostnames; still "Down"
I am in the middle of working on planning upgrades from 0.8.8f to 1.1.19. I have a fair number of IPv6 only devices. In 0.8.8f IPv6 devices needed "udp6:[v6:IP]" as the format. 1.1.19 (at least, without spine) prefers the "udp6:" to be left off. So I scripted the removal from the...
- Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:45 am
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: IPv6 Addressing Issues Cacti vs Spine
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1021
Re: IPv6 Addressing Issues Cacti vs Spine
This is still the case in 1.1.19
- Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:35 am
- Forum: Help: General
- Topic: IPv6 Addressing Issues Cacti vs Spine
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1021
IPv6 Addressing Issues Cacti vs Spine
I'm working on Cacti 1.1.16 on CentOS 7, along with Spine 1.1.16. I'm happy to see that Cacti (by itself) appears to accept IPv6 addresses - at least if you put them in []. Previously, things didn't seem to work without udp6:[IPv6::addr] as the format, but at least Cacti and cmd.php seem to be fine ...