Cacti

Hello, In the last 3 weeks since I posted on this topic (with no comment from anyone), I have found a workaround. Our Spine process were set to Concurrent Poller Processes: 4 Balance Process Load: yes Maximum Threads per Process: 15 Number of PHP Script Servers: 2 (per Spine Process) For unrelated r...

Hi Gandalf, Within the last week we have encountered the same issue with the script server as X-dark. Most of our scripts are Perl, but we do use the built-in ss-based Data Queries: "[SNMP - Get Mounted Partitions]" - 242 Graphs, and "[SNMP - Get Processor Information]" - 66 Grap...

Hi Gandalf,

That would be great.
We already Add a host and then Add it's graphs via a different script, anyway, so I see that as no different.

What was your intention for release of that updated add_device.php ?

Swordfish.

Thanks Gandalf, I see the subtleties of the "refresh" now. Sounds like I'll be walking the MYSQL tables to find my solution. Can I ask, the CLI command to do my request go on the to-do list? For us large users of Cacti; being able to administer Cacti via CLI has significant advantages and ...

Hi, We are running: Cacti Version 0.8.7h Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.7 (Tikanga) I have a large number of hosts that need to have the host template changed to a new host_template. I have looking in the "cli" folder and found what I think can help - "host_update_template....

I think if you read closely, an update to the CLI code is all you need.

gandalf wrote:You should use 087b.
The latest improvement is NOT an additional index but a pure code change
Reinhard

Rob

Hi,

We are using 087a and have the problem described here.
Moving forward I'd like to go straight to 087c (when it surfaces).

1. When is 087c scheduled to appear?
2. Is there an upgrade process to update the 087a databases with the new indices?

Rob

Gandalf,

but to the current setting of the real rrd file because they may differ

why should they differ? - for Bandwidth thy should be the same, graphs of other data might be different.
What scenario do you suggest they would be different?

Rob

Sent this to cigamit: Hi cigamit, gandalf suggested I talk to you re: http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?p=130154&sid=c66569110ba00da763d3c30768a14e99#130154 I have no idea about writing plugins, and I would have thought an option to reindex/repoll -> save (and update datasources with new max...

Thanks gandalf, Searching through things today, I have come to that conclusion, and found that same command. Going back to the configured maximum within Cacti.... Is there any way to take a newly re-polled data source and pass the newly discovered bandwidth value to be the configured maximum as show...

Hi, I'm new to this, so if there is a post with the answer kindly point me in that direction. We are using Version 0.8.7a on RHEL Server 5 I can't find the answer to a seemingly obvious issue. When graphing Interface bits in/out there is a max value discovered in the graph creation. In our case it i...

I had noticed that later, and was going to put it in the bug report.

Fishy.

I would suggest creating a tree for each customer and giving them permissions to see that tree. Mind you, you still need graph permissions, otherwise, they can see other customers graphs. Rony, I too came across this issue, and was researching to see if it was a bug or designed. It seems it was des...

Under: Console | Configuration | Settings | Poller Ping Type |Poller Host Availability Settings | Ping Type You have the text: 'The type of ping packet to sent. NOTE: ICMP requires that the Cacti Service ID have root privilages in Unix.' 'to sent' should be either 'sent' or 'to send' (using 0.8.6h) ...

I think you'll find that, as with most things with an OID, that you are pulling two values for one paging file. Do an snmpwalk from a smaller OID base (take one or two digits off the right), then you will probably see that there are seperate values for each file. You will then need to add them toget...