Cacti

This was a HUGE help. I was just forced to move my RRD files from SAN -> NFS. Boost was backlogged by about 17 million records and wasn't making any headway (but was keeping up). Threw the wrapper in and the boost backlog cleared in a few hours. Last Start Time: 2016-04-14 16:37:42 Last Run Duratio...

[quote="rony"][quote="routenull0"][quote="rony"]Currently active development is occurring in the [i]develop[/i] branch. I will be setting up automatic nightly builds based on if commits have occurred that day in the coming month. I will announce it once it is up and run...

Currently active development is occurring in the develop branch. I will be setting up automatic nightly builds based on if commits have occurred that day in the coming month. I will announce it once it is up and running. I will also be moving issue tracking to GitHub at some point in the near futur...

Only if the prefixes are on separate interfaces. Cacti is only using SNMP to graph overall interface counters.

The preferred solution for you would be Netflow.

Hanseat wrote:sooo pretty
edit:
Now, if only I could remove the " ' " apostrophes from all my graphs, that´d be even better!

Yes, where is this coming from? I don't recall it being there prior.

Edit: Reverting the changes removes the apostrophes.

How can one determine how long the RRD update process is taking? I can see how long our polling process takes, but I cannot seem to locate the over all RRD update process.

Updating to SPINE 0.8.8f didn't result in any change

Setting Max OID's on the host to 1 does appear to generate a small amount in the value differences, they aren't exactly the same when cacti polls, but they are still completely different than manually polling at the same time.

Poking around, I found this thread: http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=39166&start=15 I set the max oid's on the host to 1 and noticed different values on each polling. ./spine -v SPINE 0.8.8b Copyright 2002-2013 by The Cacti Group I'll grab SPINE 0.8.8f and see if there is any dif...

Doing some more digging, and it looks like the poller is looking at the correct OIDs, but getting the wrong value.. 09/08/2015 06:04:03 PM - SPINE: Poller[0] Host[39] TH[1] DS[1466] SNMP: v3: FIREWALL1, dsname: traffic_in_1min, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6.2, value: 439592241445 09/08/2015 06:04:03 ...

With the rollout of ScreenOS 6.3.x, Juniper made changes to incorporate subinterfaces into the SNMP information, per the KB: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB22257 Solution: The code in 6.3 has implemented certain changes, which allows the monitoring of sub-interfaces vi...

Anyone using this still post the ScreenOS 6.3 changes for Subinterfaces? We have many subinterfaces on our ScreenOS devices and most templates don't display individual subinterface stats, just the overall parent interface statistic. Juniper released an update to the firmware that changed how subinte...

The Primary Graph Tree is ordered via alphabetically only, which requires tricks to get the ordering different ways.

The ability to up/down the order manually like the sub-trees would be amazing.

That was my understanding as well, but the question I had was is there truly a problem with running the reindex script when there is a potential poller running as well? I'm sorry. Latest Cacti release is able to do this in parallel. It will increase the server load, of course. R. 0.8.8b allows it i...

Bad luck. Renaming an active interface is not catched by our reindex methods, currently. We will improve this a bit, but your case is not catched by that move. The reason for this is, that a whole SNMP table scan is expensive related to only fetching a few data for those interfaces, that are graphe...

Do the interface names change while the interface number remains constant? In this case, you may define a different automatic reindex trigger to get things solved R. Correct, it is mostly interface name/descriptions updating from "DISABLED" or the link to a system hostname or circuit iden...