Search found 5 matches
- Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:23 am
- Forum: Help: Linux/Unix Specific
- Topic: 64-bit Counter
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1148
Re: 64-bit Counter
rra[0].cf = "AVERAGE" rra[0].rows = 500 rra[0].cur_row = 441 rra[0].pdp_per_row = 1 rra[0].xff = 5.0000000000e-01 rra[0].cdp_prep[0].value = NaN rra[0].cdp_prep[0].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[0].cdp_prep[1].value = NaN rra[0].cdp_prep[1].unknown_datapoints = 0 rra[1].cf = "AVERAGE&quo...
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:53 am
- Forum: Help: Linux/Unix Specific
- Topic: 64-bit Counter
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1148
Re: 64-bit Counter
Did you find any important in the rrdtool info?
Thank you,
Thank you,
- Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:18 am
- Forum: Help: Linux/Unix Specific
- Topic: 64-bit Counter
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1148
Re: 64-bit Counter
thanks for your help Gandalf, here is the rrdtool info cacti:/var/data/cacti/rra# rrdtool info fonesstn02_traffic_in_9881.rrd filename = "device_traffic_in_9881.rrd" rrd_version = "0003" step = 300 last_update = 1332746105 ds[traffic_in].type = "COUNTER" ds[traffic_in]....
- Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:07 am
- Forum: Help: Linux/Unix Specific
- Topic: 64-bit Counter
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1148
Re: 64-bit Counter
Thank you very much Gandalf,
This is the OID: .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10.6 this is a Counter64 so i think it's ok.
Maybe the problem is in the graph template? can we define a limit there that can explain this behaviour?.
Sorry if this are obvious questions, i'm really not an expert.![:oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
This is the OID: .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.10.6 this is a Counter64 so i think it's ok.
Maybe the problem is in the graph template? can we define a limit there that can explain this behaviour?.
Sorry if this are obvious questions, i'm really not an expert.
![:oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
- Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:53 am
- Forum: Help: Linux/Unix Specific
- Topic: 64-bit Counter
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1148
64-bit Counter
Hi Guys, I'm generating my Interface-Traffic graphs with a 64-bit counter but i'm seeing some extrange behaviours, you can see itin the attachment "graph_image.png" it looks like the counter is reset when the traffic pass the 100 Mbps barrier, this is like the counter is 32-bit in place of...