Cacti

hey gilles,
I just wanted to say to you a big thanks for this plugin.
I installed it simply flawless in cacti 0.8.7b using the Plugin Management.
Everything went perfect and I had uptime running in a minute!
Many thanks again! and keep up with the good work.
Chris

hello, I've just installed it on my cacti 0.8.7b with plugin architecture latest version PA 2.1 on a CentOS 5.2 x86... The problem is that I can't find it anywhere in the webinterface to approve it. I've placed it even right under the settings plugin but without luck. With PA I have a plugin managem...

A correction for clog:
I found it under Plugin Management in cacti and approved it from there... it didn't appear like the other ones under realm.
cool!

with host info though I'm without luck

same with Host Info 0.2
I guess this plugins are not compatible with PA architecture plugin model?

Hello guys (...and girls?), I have cacti latest version + the plugin architecture installed, I installed the plugin thold and it works. The problem is that I installed the plugin clog 1.0 but it doesn't appear in realm permissions so that I can approve it. I moved it right under the settings plugin ...

ha haa.. it's working now again!
Thanks steagu! you're the man.

quick update log: I set under XP device in Cacti downed device detection: ping, ping method: tcp ping and port 3389 (RDP) + enabled it in Firewall and now it's with status recovering.
So I guess in the next few poller crons the graphs should update as well.

What are you using for your downed device detection? SNMP or PING? When the firewall is enabled, and you click on the Device Properties, does it say "Host is alive" or the SNMP info or host is down? What i've had to do with some of my hosts is use TCP Ping and change to a port that I know...

Hello, I have a CentOS 5.2 x86 machine running Cacti latest... after many many errors from the software and from me as well :) Anyway, I have graphs for the local machine and I need to add a Win XP x86 machine for monitoring. I configured SNMP on it correctly but the thing is that the graphs for it ...