Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1744 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
staffann
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Warnings in the result file

There are a few warnings in the result file that I seem to have on quite many workunits. I have enclosed part of the file below, and marked the relevant warnings as bold.

I'd like to ask if they are a real problem. If they are, something needs to be done. If not, should they be warnings at all?

There are 3 warnings I've marked:
1. Warning about VersionInfo size
2. Warning about divide by zero. Usually not a good sign!
3. Warning about unrecognised keyword: compute_unbound_extended

/Staffan

<core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
World Community Grid AutoDock (projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcg_faah_autodock_5.28_windows_intelx86) version Failed to get VersionInfo size: 1812

Failed to get VersionInfo size: 1812

INFO: projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcg_faah_autodock_5.28_windows_intelx86 Start AutoGrid...
INFO:[15:42:30] Start AutoGrid...
autogrid: WARNING! While calculating an H-O or H-N bond vector...
Attempt to divide by zero was just prevented.
Are the coordinates of atoms 908 and 908 the same?

autogrid: WARNING! While calculating an H-O or H-N bond vector...
Attempt to divide by zero was just prevented.
Are the coordinates of atoms 915 and 915 the same?

autogrid: WARNING! While calculating an H-O or H-N bond vector...
Attempt to divide by zero was just prevented.
Are the coordinates of atoms 1831 and 1831 the same?

autogrid: WARNING! While calculating an H-O or H-N bond vector...
Attempt to divide by zero was just prevented.
Are the coordinates of atoms 1838 and 1838 the same?


autogrid: autogrid4: Successful Completion.
wcg_checkpoint() called
Starting to checkpoint ...
Debug: Start saveState
Debug: checkpoint start
Debug: Before boinc_checkpoint_completed
Checkpoint complete
INFO:[15:44:00] End AutoGrid...
Beginning AutoDock...
INFO: Setting num_generations: 27000
Setting maxGen to 6750
autodock4: WARNING: Unrecognized keyword in docking parameter file, in line:
compute_unbound_extended # compute extended ligand energyINFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.

About to enter main loop...(dockings already completed: 0)
----------------------------------------

[Nov 12, 2006 12:52:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Warnings in the result file

These are normal. While the warnings may appear useless now, they may be of use when things go wrong and the scientists need to diagnose the problem. I think it's just simpler to leave the warnings in.
[Nov 12, 2006 12:58:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
staffann
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Warnings in the result file

Thank you for the answer.

As a programmer myself, I agree that having warning messages in the code is a good thing. However, there should never be warning messages when everything works normally because users will get used to there being warnings and won't notice any additional ones.

Anyway, knowing everything is alright is enough for me. Thanks!
----------------------------------------

[Nov 12, 2006 2:59:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread