Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 7
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1662 times and has 6 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

Does Scripps Research Institute or Olson Labs do any further research/development to improve the efficiency of the protein-ligand free energy calculation algorithm for FAAH?

For example, there are two published papers from Folding@Home which claim improved efficiency for protein-ligand free energy calculations:

Fujitsu Labs

Shirts et al. used about 400 000 CPU days
for the eight binding-energy calculations and obtained binding
free energies with a rms error from a linear fit of about
1 kcal/mol and a maximum deviation from the fit of
2 kcal/mol. We performed similar calculations on the Fujitsu
BioServer and obtained more predictive binding free energies
with a rms error from a linear fit of only 0.4 kcal/mol
and a maximum deviation from the fit of 0.6 kcal/mol, using
very similar methodologies as the previous study, but with
significantly less computational power about 50 000 CPU
days.


Michael Shirts thesis

I also present data from various systems demonstrating that this method is in practice several times more efficient than other commonly used methods.

[Nov 1, 2006 3:29:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

http://autodock.scripps.edu/
I was about to say that AutoDock has been under continuous development since 1990, but looking at the copyright notice on the web page, I have to amend that to 1989.
[Nov 1, 2006 4:13:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

Great question!

We are continually working to improve all aspects of AutoDock, including both the search efficiency and the way we score our candidate dockings. Last night, for example, I succeeded in improving the ability of the Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm to search the orientational degrees of freedom of the ligand. We are also currently working on improving the binding free energy predictions (but unfortunately, I cannot give any more details than that, until our new methods are published).

These changes won't make it into the version of AutoDock running on the World Community Grid until we release a new version of the client.

In the meantime, as always, thank you to everyone who donates their computer's idle cycles to FightAIDS@Home: rest assured, your donations of computer time are not going to waste.

Dr Garrett M. Morris
(Olson Laboratory, Molecular Graphics Lab)
[Nov 2, 2006 11:02:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

ONYA Doc. biggrin
[Nov 2, 2006 11:51:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
zombie67 [MM]
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: May 26, 2006
Post Count: 228
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

We are continually working to improve all aspects of AutoDock, including both the search efficiency and the way we score our candidate dockings. Last night, for example, I succeeded in improving the ability of the Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm to search the orientational degrees of freedom of the ligand. We are also currently working on improving the binding free energy predictions (but unfortunately, I cannot give any more details than that, until our new methods are published).


In addition to improving the efficiency of the science, is there any work being done to improve the efficiency of the WUs, to maximize the use of the individual machine architecture? For example, the work from alexkan has made even lowly G4 macs about as productive as P4 windows machines.
----------------------------------------

[Nov 3, 2006 5:16:55 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

Any estimate on when you will release the new agent?
[Nov 3, 2006 11:54:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Improving Algorithm Efficiency of Autodock/FAAH

In the meantime, as always, thank you to everyone who donates their computer's idle cycles to FightAIDS@Home: rest assured, your donations of computer time are not going to waste.

Dr Garrett M. Morris
(Olson Laboratory, Molecular Graphics Lab)


Thank you very much for your response and words of encouragement, Dr. Morris. We always appreciate and value any updates from the project scientists. biggrin
[Nov 3, 2006 4:13:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread