| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 25
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Based upon the intel-mac results being returned so far, the workunits are running in about 1/8th the time they were taking previously (in other words they are now running 8 times faster then they were when the were running under emulation). The computers we did testing on ran in 1/3 the time but the gain could vary by processor or memory. Thanks for the update! With the native processes I average about 4.5 hours per faah work unit on my MacBook Pro (2.0 GHz, 1 GB RAM). Much more consistent with the results I was expecting. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Excellent news on the Intel Mac binaries!
My Mac was previously typically taking over 24 hours for a work unit, and now it has just finished two FAAH work units in just over 4 hours. ![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
So Sir Fraz, are u saying that extrapolated u would now be doing 12 FAAH's in a day on dual core, where previously 1, or was the 24 hours a single core indication i.e. 2 running on 2 cores thus 6x the past......if 12, i go and get one
---------------------------------------- PS pardon my ignorance, but really dont know Apples and whether emulated mode only allowed for 1 WU at the time ![]()
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
So Sir Fraz, are u saying that extrapolated u would now be doing 12 FAAH's in a day on dual core, where previously 1, or was the 24 hours a single core indication i.e. 2 running on 2 cores thus 6x the past......if 12, i go and get one Hi, Yes, about 6-7 times as fast, not 12 unfortunately! A single core was taking ~28 hours in emulation mode per FAAH work unit on average, and now it is taking about 4.5 hours natively. I have my Macbook Pro Boinc client set up to use only one of the two cores; well, as it happens, the work units usually have more than a single thread, so normally some percentage of each core is used, adding up to 100% of a single CPU. It's set up like this as the memory hit of running two work units is rather large, even with a gigabyte of RAM. Plus, if you didn't know already, Macbooks and Macbook Pros run VERY hot when both cores are fully used for any length of time. Egg-frying hot, in fact: http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/07/17/macbook_frys_egg/ PS pardon my ignorance, but really dont know Apples and whether emulated mode only allowed for 1 WU at the time ![]() When I first set it up it was running two work units in emulation mode, so I guess it can. You wouldn't want it resting on your lap though... well, not without an asbestos mat. ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I look forward to many more intel macs signing up! We now have intel-mac binaries available for FightAIDS@Home and Help Defeat Cancer. Great news. I like this project and hope to add a Mac Pro in the not too distant future. (2 fast dual core Xeons or 4 processors). In the meantime my Pentium M 1.73 and my old but still running iBook 600 (600 mhz G3) will keep on crunching. |
||
|
|
|