Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Locked
Total posts in this thread: 26
Posts: 26   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3005 times and has 25 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: WAPSTATS

Please can we draw a line under this now? BrainSmashR's current sig is perfectly fine, even if it only benefits himself. We can deal with the fallout from wapstats when they become available.

The jingoistic comments are not the kind of thing we want here; it's a poor advertisment for WCG. I don't want to have to disturb the admins, so please play nice.
[Jun 19, 2006 7:10:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: WAPSTATS

Actually, doing things just because you can with no regard for anyone else is the pathetic thing about merkins not the funny thing. The other pathetic thing is that you think Frenchy is the ultimate insult. You still don't seem to realise the Frenchys (and most everybody else) knew there were no WMD in Iraq tongue.

No, poor Brain(Dead)SmashR, I'm no Frenchy but I would rather be Frenchy than merkin. Now let's see, a DDOS can be done so why not. Funny thing about us Canucks, eh?


Just like you lied about suffering from my server, you're now lying about WMD.

• Found: 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium

• Found: 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons

• Found: Roadside bomb loaded with sarin gas

• Found: 1,000 radioactive materials--ideal for radioactive dirty bombs

• Found: 17 chemical warheads--some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin

BTW, there's a difference between offering signatures and intentionally denying service to someone through a DDOS attack.....but I wouldn't expect a trolling piece of trash like you to utilize something like common sense.

....but feel free, I rent server space specifically so I don't have to waste my time prosecuting script kiddies.

Don't let your mouth write a check you can't cash, Frenchie.

--

This post has been edited for inappropriate language - nelsoc
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 19, 2006 10:31:46 PM]
[Jun 19, 2006 7:49:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Re: WAPSTATS

I second the motion, for Didactylos to contact the admins to shut down this thread.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jun 19, 2006 9:21:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: WAPSTATS

biggrin

Brain(Dead)SmashR,

You're hilarious!! Please post more. We have a bet going here regarding just how stupid you really are. Not even your Presidunce Dubya is stupid enough to repeat the nonsense you post about WMD because those reports were all debunked ages ago. Now we know you are even thicker than Dubya. Maybe you should use your head for something other than holding up your ears?

Also, Dagorath is obviously Canadian not French. Why do you persist in calling him Frenchy? Are all Americans as stupid as you?

The only one lying here is YOU, BrainDeadSmashR. You are also a hypocrite. As you've already pointed out, it's not necessary to evaluate one's actions, it's OK to just do it because you can. Does that not apply to DDOS too? Or is that privilege reserved only for merkins?
[Jun 19, 2006 9:28:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: WAPSTATS

Okay, nelsoc: can you please do your thing in this thread then consider locking it before it gets out of hand?

And for the record: no weapons grade material was found in Iraq, and no WMD delivery system was found. This particular list has been widely circulated, but is mostly misinformation.
Miniter claims that in Iraq we:

- Found: 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
- Found: 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons
- Found: Roadside bomb loaded with sarin gas
- Found: 1,000 radioactive materials–ideal for radioactive dirty bombs
- Found: 17 chemical warheads–some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin

Now for the facts:

The 1.77 Tons of Enriched Uranium
The Energy Department announced in July 2004 that it had removed from Iraq “radiological and nuclear materials that could potentially be used in a radiological dispersal device or diverted to support a nuclear weapons program.” This included the “1.77 metric tons of LOW-enriched uranium.” The reason the Administration is not now touting this as evidence of WMD is because they would be laughed at by anyone with more expertise than David Miniter. Low-enriched uranium cannot be used in an atomic weapon-only as reactor fuel, a purpose which Iraq was entirely free to pursue under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and UN-imposed WMD restrictions.

The 1000 Radioactive Materials
Pointing to the applicability of nuclear materials in a “radiological dispersal device” is utterly disingenuous-these materials exist, legally, in nearly every country on earth. One might as well point to cutlery in someone’s kitchen to “prove” he is plotting murder. In fact, the hideous irony is that in the chaos of the 2003 invasion, nuclear facilities were plundered and much nuclear material was indiscriminately released-resulting in a real radiological hazard for local Iraqis (as we reported at the time). Leave it to Bush to actually create the very danger he uses to justify his military adventure.

The 1500 Gallons of Chemical Weapons
Then, there’s the supposed “chemical weapons.” Oops! Turns out when you actually read the original source (Washington Post, Aug. 14, 2005) it wasn’t “1,500 gallons of chemical weapons,” but just “1,500 gallons of chemicals.” These were potential “precursor agents” for chemical weapons, the Pentagon boasted upon the discovery-but the fact that the Administration is no longer touting these claims is evidence the supposed weapons program didn’t get very far, if it existed at all.

The Roadside Sarin Bomb
The two roadside sarin shells were of an ancient vintage, dating from the 1980’s, prior to the first Gulf War. It is of particular note that other than the two isolated shells found, no more have turned up, leading to the obvious conclusion that these two stragglers were simply the last rusting vestiges of a long-abandoned program. We KNOW that Saddam had a chemical program prior to the first Gulf War, but we can also safely conclude that he had nothing after the Gulf War. This was confirmed by the Bush-appointed Duelfer Report.

The 17 Chemical Warheads
Even Fox News had to admit that the cyclosarin warheads found by Polish troops in July 2004 “date back to Saddam Hussein’s war with Iran in the 1980s.” The BBC added that “the US military said the agent was so deteriorated it posed no threat.”

Walter Ludwig, in the Star Tribune

I hope that will help lay the ghosts of this particular piece of misinformation.
[Jun 19, 2006 9:37:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: WAPSTATS

Hey Brain(Dead)SmashR,

Remember Ancient Chinese Proverb...

"Be careful what you ask for on the Internet because you might get it."

beat up <<< Is that you Brain(Dead)SmashR?


biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin biggrin
[Jun 19, 2006 10:17:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 26   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread