Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 103
Posts: 103   Pages: 11   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7555 times and has 102 replies Next Thread
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Are points being awarded fairly?

Dave, here's what I have from this morning:

6/2/2006 3:08:17 AM||Suspending computation and network activity - running CPU benchmarks
6/2/2006 3:08:17 AM|World Community Grid|Pausing result faah0518_d151cb121_x1hpv_02_2 (removed from memory)
6/2/2006 3:08:18 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
6/2/2006 3:08:19 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
6/2/2006 3:09:19 AM||Benchmark results:
6/2/2006 3:09:19 AM|| Number of CPUs: 1
6/2/2006 3:09:19 AM|| 1320 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/2/2006 3:09:19 AM|| 2733 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
6/2/2006 3:09:19 AM||Finished CPU benchmarks
6/2/2006 3:09:20 AM||Resuming computation and network activity
6/2/2006 3:09:20 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities
6/2/2006 3:09:20 AM|World Community Grid|Restarting result faah0518_d151cb121_x1hpv_02_2 using faah version 509

I'm still 5.2.13 myself. My point was that it won't necessarily restart the same WU you were on. Easiest way to see that is to have one WU preempted (suspend and resume it) and one after it running when the benchmarks run.


Well, well. On those occasions where I happened to see this in the Messages tab, it was always overnight like above. However, my presumption that it occurs daily is apparently incorrect as this did not occur in the wee hours of this morning. That's today's trivia.
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jun 6, 2006 5:58:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher
UK
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 11062
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Are points being awarded fairly?

Ah you see you see easily missed Keith blushing. I must confess before I looked closely I honestly believed my little ditty above re: boinc and it's benchmarking

I'm still convinced that BOINC spends less time proving how fast the processors are than UD.

I've sorted out my 5.4.9 glitch (it is a glitch I'm sure it will be fixed soon) by setting up another profile and applying it to my 5.4.9 cruncher so it downloads 5 days worth.

Loads of WU's to crunch - nice smile
----------------------------------------

[Jun 6, 2006 6:40:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Are points being awarded fairly?

Yep. Sad but true. Such is old age biggrin Coming from the background of recalling UD doing this after every WU, expecting BOINC to do this daily is not that surprising. So, it's even better than we thought wink
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jun 6, 2006 7:24:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 103   Pages: 11   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread