Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 1
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1244 times and has 0 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Opteron vs. Xeon Memory Intensive vs. Floating Point operations.

In the article mentioned below, Tyan, the maker of high end motherboard products says:

Tyan will provide customers a choice of two platforms, AMD Opteron and Intel Xeon. When asked about which platform better fits which sort of task, the company answered that Opteron is the optimal choice for memory-intensive applications, but Xeon processors beat Opteron in terms of performance measured in FLOPS (floating-point operations per second).

http://www.digitimes.com/systems/a20051124PR200.html

I thought that the Opteron was better all around for any computing function versus the Xeon but after looking at some of the Xeon work unit output rates I'm starting to believe that may be the case.

I was looking at the host stats for this project:

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/host_stats.php?pr=wcg&st=0&to=100

and I'm getting the feeling that the Xeon might be outperforming most any other cpu when it comes to floating point operations.

The World Community Grid application uses floating point operations intensively, yes?
[Nov 27, 2005 5:35:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread