Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 
World Community Grid Forums
  Category: Active Research
  Forum: Mapping Cancer Markers Forum
  Thread: 40 minute due times??

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2189 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
Aperture_Science_Innovators
Advanced Cruncher
United States
Joined: Jul 6, 2009
Post Count: 139
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused 40 minute due times??
One of my devices received a batch of WUs that seemingly were only valid for 40 minutes (!):

MCM1_0193375_7227_0 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8043_1 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8061_0 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8054_1 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8088_0 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8086_0 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8090_1 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8087_1 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8085_0 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8089_0 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC
MCM1_0193381_8104_1 Rome No Reply 2022-12-12 16:17:33 UTC 2022-12-12 16:53:13 UTC


I'm familiar with the 3-day resends, but this is nuts. The wingman received a full six days:
- https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/contribution/workunit/229474012
- https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/contribution/workunit/229474084
- https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/contribution/workunit/229473912

Anyone seen something like this?
----------------------------------------
[Dec 12, 2022 6:34:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Taurus Oldbull
Advanced Cruncher
US
Joined: Nov 26, 2020
Post Count: 59
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 40 minute due times??
Clearly Krembil is preparing for the future... quantum computing! :)
[Dec 13, 2022 2:37:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2346
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 40 minute due times??
One of my devices received a batch of WUs that seemingly were only valid for 40 minutes (!):
…

Anyone seen something like this?

Yes, but this was not for MCM. There was this unbelievably short due time of 40 seconds for one OPN1-task seen here:

  "resultId": 371637833,
  "workunitId": 231613242,
  "resultName": "OPN1_0127139_01234_0",
  "os": "Linux CentOS Stream",
  "osVersion": "CentOS Stream 8 [4.18.0-408.el8.x86_64|libc 2.28]",
  "appVersionNumber": "721",
  "status": 4,
  "statusName": "Valid",
  "sentTime": "2022-12-16T10:36:33+0000",
  "dueTime": "2022-12-16T10:37:13+0000", <=== <=== <=== <===
  "returnedTime": "2022-12-16T12:19:33+0000",
  "cpuHours": 1.70346,
  "elapsedTime": 1.71067,
  "claimedCredit": 13.82810386919884,
  "grantedCredit": 54.44590830730113,
  "deviceName": "wcg-instance.novalocal",


That's why another wingman kicked in 54 seconds later:
workunit 231613242
App: OpenPandemics - COVID 19
Workunit: OPN1_0127139_01234
Created: 2022-12-15T20:44:49
Quorum: 2
Replication: 2

OPN1_0127139_01234_0  Linux CentOS  Valid  2022-12-16T10:36:33  2022-12-16T12:19:33    1.70/1.71      13.8/54.4  
OPN1_0127139_01234_1  Fedora Linux  SAbrt  2022-12-16T10:36:50  2022-12-17T08:19:15    0.00/0.00       0.0/0.0   
OPN1_0127139_01234_2  Linux Ubuntu  Valid  2022-12-16T10:37:27  2022-12-16T18:55:01    3.93/4.50      95.1/54.4


FInding this case was easy because I was alerted that my task was Server Aborted in the output of wcglog that was generated by wcgresults.

I believe this has to do with a bug in the system where one date field gets filled with a wrong value. This is not something that was introduced this year, it was already spotted several times in the past (back in the IBM days).
[Dec 17, 2022 11:23:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread