Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 48
|
![]() |
Author |
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 766 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Below from old Intel integrated GPU system running Ubuntu 20.04 just re-tried on GPU.
----------------------------------------Previous attempts got a few valid results but mostly bad. All units validated OK so far, just started quorum 1. Similar(identical?) system running Ubuntu 18.04 get reasonable credits, around 200. This is deviceId=7767494, other is 5065639, both Lenovo E50-00. Any idea why the credit si so low? OPNG_0092214_00216_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS [5.4.0-77-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.3)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:02:51 UTC 2021-10-08 14:28:37 UTC 0.11 / 0.48 0.3 / 406.7 OPNG_0092214_00216_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:05:07 UTC 2021-10-08 12:47:19 UTC 0.29 / 0.37 0 / 7.7 OPNG_0092180_00505_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS [5.4.0-77-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.3)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:02:51 UTC 2021-10-08 15:12:31 UTC 0.16 / 0.71 0.5 / 586.7 OPNG_0092180_00505_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:05:07 UTC 2021-10-08 12:31:41 UTC 0.32 / 0.43 0 / 7.9 OPNG_0092202_00305_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-08 10:37:03 UTC 2021-10-08 11:04:27 UTC 0.3 / 0.37 0 / 7.9 OPNG_0092202_00305_1 Linux Fedora Fedora 34 (Thirty Four) [5.13.13-200.fc34.x86_64|libc 2.33 (GNU libc)] Valid 2021-10-08 10:37:25 UTC 2021-10-08 11:29:32 UTC 0.04 / 0.86 0.4 / 577.5 Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
Bryn Mawr
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 26, 2018 Post Count: 339 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Below from old Intel integrated GPU system running Ubuntu 20.04 just re-tried on GPU. Previous attempts got a few valid results but mostly bad. All units validated OK so far, just started quorum 1. Similar(identical?) system running Ubuntu 18.04 get reasonable credits, around 200. This is deviceId=7767494, other is 5065639, both Lenovo E50-00. Any idea why the credit si so low? OPNG_0092214_00216_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS [5.4.0-77-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.3)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:02:51 UTC 2021-10-08 14:28:37 UTC 0.11 / 0.48 0.3 / 406.7 OPNG_0092214_00216_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:05:07 UTC 2021-10-08 12:47:19 UTC 0.29 / 0.37 0 / 7.7 OPNG_0092180_00505_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS [5.4.0-77-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.3)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:02:51 UTC 2021-10-08 15:12:31 UTC 0.16 / 0.71 0.5 / 586.7 OPNG_0092180_00505_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-08 12:05:07 UTC 2021-10-08 12:31:41 UTC 0.32 / 0.43 0 / 7.9 OPNG_0092202_00305_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-08 10:37:03 UTC 2021-10-08 11:04:27 UTC 0.3 / 0.37 0 / 7.9 OPNG_0092202_00305_1 Linux Fedora Fedora 34 (Thirty Four) [5.13.13-200.fc34.x86_64|libc 2.33 (GNU libc)] Valid 2021-10-08 10:37:25 UTC 2021-10-08 11:29:32 UTC 0.04 / 0.86 0.4 / 577.5 Paul. Not certain with GPU tasks but normally it’s because the benchmarks have not been run. |
||
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 766 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Forced a benchmark run to be sure, no values for GPU shown and no change in credit.
----------------------------------------Do benchmarks measure GPUs? Another below, others claimed credit also low. OPNG_0092482_00319_0 Linux Debian Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid [5.10.0-8-amd64|libc 2.31 (Debian GLIBC 2.31-17)] Invalid 2021-10-09 15:15:38 UTC 2021-10-09 15:21:49 UTC 0.1 / 0.1 0 / 0 OPNG_0092482_00319_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-09 15:15:56 UTC 2021-10-09 15:36:48 UTC 0.27 / 0.34 0 / 8.2 OPNG_0092482_00319_2 Linux Fedora Fedora 33 (Thirty Three) [5.11.15-200.fc33.x86_64|libc 2.32 (GNU libc)] Valid 2021-10-09 15:37:46 UTC 2021-10-10 07:22:58 UTC 0.14 / 0.47 0.5 / 658.5 Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 766 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
More:
----------------------------------------OPNG_0092972_00419_0 Linux Fedora Fedora 34 (Thirty Four) [5.13.13-200.fc34.x86_64|libc 2.33 (GNU libc)] Valid 2021-10-11 11:41:53 UTC 2021-10-11 13:19:07 UTC 0.03 / 0.76 0.4 / 650.6 OPNG_0092972_00419_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-11 13:19:30 UTC 2021-10-11 13:39:15 UTC 0.23 / 0.29 0 / 7.4 OPNG_0092675_00351_0 Linux Fedora Fedora 33 (Thirty Three) [5.11.15-200.fc33.x86_64|libc 2.32 (GNU libc)] Valid 2021-10-10 03:15:00 UTC 2021-10-11 03:06:27 UTC 0.12 / 0.37 0.4 / 493.1 OPNG_0092675_00351_1 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-11 03:07:07 UTC 2021-10-11 03:32:34 UTC 0.31 / 0.41 0 / 12.5 Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 912 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One thing those low-credit tasks seem to have in common is that their credit claim is zero, whereas the others are all zero-point-something. That may well make a difference to the code path followed in credit scoring, in the same way that extreme excesses n claims have been known to do!
----------------------------------------I'm definitely intrigued by that zero(!), but without knowing the content of all the BOINC-related information that was sent back to WCG along with the science data at the end of the tasks, I can't speculate further. It would be interesting if the techs could explain this, but it's probably (quite reasonably) another of those things that's not exactly urgent at present! Cheers - Al. [Edited to replace text that seems to have disappeared off the last paragraph!] [Edit 1 times, last edit by alanb1951 at Oct 12, 2021 9:37:31 AM] |
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2131 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One thing those low-credit tasks seem to have in common is that their credit claim is zero, whereas the others are all zero-point-something. Well, that's a rounding effect, Al. I don't know if you can view workunit 840770888: OPNG_0092675_00351_0 Linux Fedora Valid 2021-10-10T03:15:00 2021-10-11T03:06:27 0.12/0.37 0.4/493.1 Anyway, I was Paul's wingman (OPNG_0092675_00351_0) and his claimed credit is 0.006632927401071688. [Edit 1 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Oct 12, 2021 7:36:33 AM] |
||
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 912 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Adri,
Thanks for showing the work unit number for one with the issue! That is very interesting, as it tends to suggest that the client appears to have either messed up the credit request somehow or has enormous run-times for some (or all) CPU tasks (which might completely distort the credit calculation too...) I presumed the display of a zero was a rounding issue :-) though if the claim had really been for zero that would've been a valuable diagnostic! --- I probably should have said "their credit claim is reported as zero"... I am more interested in whether the smallness of claim might trigger the award issue :-) After all, we know the claimed credit shouldn't make any difference for OPNG tasks, don't we?!?.. Cheers - Al. By the way, I've only just noticed that it seems to have cut the end off the last paragraph of my earlier message - I've repaired that but left the credit text alone so as not to alter the context for your message! |
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2131 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Al,
----------------------------------------I presumed the display of a zero was a rounding issue :-) though if the claim had really been for zero that would've been a valuable diagnostic! --- I probably should have said "their credit claim is reported as zero"... Maybe I should have noted that my formatted text came from my program 'wcgstats', showing "0.0" for OPNG_0092675_00351_1, while 'wcgformat' is sure to show "0" as well, as Paul reported and as can - still, but not for too long anymore - be witnessed on this URL: Result name OS type Status Sent time Due / Return time CPUtime/Elapsed Claimed/Granted My problem is that the width of a line is just a tad too small to represent, while the tags 'code' and 'size' don't work together anymore, as they did before 'the big change'. After all, we know the claimed credit shouldn't make any difference for OPNG tasks, don't we?!?.. Right. ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Oct 12, 2021 10:51:40 AM] |
||
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 766 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Latest:
----------------------------------------OPNG_0093384_00432_0 Linux Fedora Fedora 34 (Xfce) [5.13.19-200.fc34.x86_64|libc 2.33 (GNU libc)] Valid 2021-10-12 23:22:58 UTC 2021-10-13 06:51:28 UTC 0.11 / 0.38 0.4 / 545.7 OPNG_0093384_00432_1 Linux Debian Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid [5.10.0-8-amd64|libc 2.31 (Debian GLIBC 2.31-17)] Invalid 2021-10-12 23:23:10 UTC 2021-10-12 23:29:07 UTC 0.1 / 0.1 0 / 0 OPNG_0093384_00432_2 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS [5.11.0-37-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.2)] Valid 2021-10-13 06:52:07 UTC 2021-10-13 07:34:43 UTC 0.28 / 0.37 0 / 10.9 Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
spRocket
Senior Cruncher Joined: Mar 25, 2020 Post Count: 265 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One of the nice things you can do now on the results page is download your results in CSV format, handy for importing into a spreadsheet. I've noticed that credit per GPU hour is quite variable. I'm mostly seeing 6000-7000 BOINC credits/hr on a GTX 960, but there are outliers in both directions.
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by spRocket at Oct 13, 2021 10:39:03 AM] |
||
|
|
![]() |