| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 17
|
|
| Author |
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Can't remember seeing such a slow task as this one: 111 hours uninterrupted, probably on a slow device.
workunit 793231610: ARP1_0018061_086_1-- Linux 727 Valid 8/27/21 18:30:31 9/1/21 15:48:29 110.97 974.0 / 789.8Details:Project Name: Africa Rainfall Project |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12594 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
My i5 M520 regularly takes over 4 days (96 hours). I don't use it for ARP during hot periods as it shuts itself down too often.
Mike |
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2346 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Now here's one that took over five days (135 CPU hours), Mike:
workunit 793258424: ARP1_0024991_084_1-- Linux Fedora 727 Valid 8/27/21 18:52:51 8/28/21 09:02:33 12.51 672.5 / 757.6 |
||
|
|
sam6861
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Mar 31, 2020 Post Count: 107 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Here is my slow Intel Atom N270 32 bit, 2GB RAM, 1 core 2 threads. Given it 1 more try since the deadline appears to have been extended to 8 days. With 1 task (50% CPU threads), ARP1 completed slightly less then 7 days.
ARP1_0031733_087 Sent Received Hours Credits[Time 0], [Time 1] [11:06:22] [21:11:01] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-22_06:00:00 [11:27:33] [23:00:25] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-22_12:00:00 [08:16:27] [00:36:23] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-22_18:00:00 [23:05:15] [01:45:27] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-23_00:00:00 [18:55:02] [03:18:30] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-23_06:00:00 [18:37:56] [05:08:19] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-23_12:00:00 [15:42:09] [06:45:40] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-23_18:00:00 [08:04:59] [07:57:56] INFO: Checkpoint taken at 2018-12-24_00:00:00 [08:16:01] [07:59:15] (4622): called boinc_finish(0) Around 17 to 25 hours for each checkpoint. With just 1 task at a time it can make it. Trying to run 2 tasks at the same time (1 ARP1 + 1 OPN1/MIP1) slows down Intel Atom N270 too much it would go past the ARP1 deadline. |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12594 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
sam6861
The recommendation for ARP is a maximum of half of total threads so you are within that. However, you should be able to run an OPN or MCM alongside that ARP. Mike |
||
|
|
Grumpy Swede
Master Cruncher Svíþjóð Joined: Apr 10, 2020 Post Count: 2494 Status: Recently Active Project Badges:
|
My stone age ACER Aspire M5641 from 2009, (Q8200 CPU, on a MCP73PV MB, 4GB, OS Vista), seems to take around 36-38 hours for an ARP task, running 1 ARP, and 3 MCM1. I don't know the exact times yet, since I've never been running ARP on that stone age machine before. I usually do not run it at all, but now I though I should have some fun with ancient hardware.
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 3 times, last edit by Grumpy Swede at Oct 18, 2021 8:41:20 PM] |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12594 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
36-38 hours would classify as 'reliable'. Try it with 2 ARP just for fun! I might even try my 2-core Vista machine which is sitting in the loft, now Winter is approaching.
Mike |
||
|
|
Grumpy Swede
Master Cruncher Svíþjóð Joined: Apr 10, 2020 Post Count: 2494 Status: Recently Active Project Badges:
|
I'll do that, but I fear that will be one bridge too far, for that old machine.
----------------------------------------![]() Edit: I can directly see, that 2 ARP, and 2 MCM1 on a Core2 Quad CPU Q8200, with 4GB memory, is one ARP too much. The progress of both is now down to a crawl. With 1 ARP, and 3 MCM1, the progress seems to be 3%/hour, now it looks as if it's down to 1.5%/hour at best. Of course, in total 2 ARP at a time would in that case, if the runtime is doubled/ARP, produce the same as 1 ARP at a time. However, that old computer does not need that much pain. I'll revert to just 1 ARP, and 3 MCM1. But this old dinosaur computer is not something I will continue to run BOINC on. This was just a fun test of old hardware. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Grumpy Swede at Oct 19, 2021 12:48:13 AM] |
||
|
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12594 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I suspect the problem is the 4 GB rather than old age or CPU.
Mike |
||
|
|
Grumpy Swede
Master Cruncher Svíþjóð Joined: Apr 10, 2020 Post Count: 2494 Status: Recently Active Project Badges:
|
I suspect the problem is the 4 GB rather than old age or CPU. Mike Yes, highly likely. And since that computer is ACER made, and not something I put together myself from parts, it's got a lot of "extra" ACER programs running too, which I haven't bothered to remove or turn off. So, I noticed that with 2 ARP, and 2 MCM1 running, it started to "touch" the swap file from time to time. Then of course, the DDR2 memory isn't the fastest memory either. ![]() As of now, the running ARP is at 70.5%, after a runtime of 25 hours, and 56 minutes. |
||
|
|
|