Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 2
|
![]() |
Author |
|
ThreadRipper
Veteran Cruncher Sweden Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 1321 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi all,
----------------------------------------I noticed an interesting thing since a few version updates ago of BOINC, but I don't know if it is a BOINC bug or WU bug or what but, these are the symptoms: Let's say I have BOINC running 100% CPU time and 100% core utilization for many days. I check in HWInfo64 (and can hear from my fans spinnings loudly) that everything is crunching away. Tdie temps of 73-78 C, CPU power draw is reported as 310-340W. Okay nice :) Now, let's say I need a reboot of my machine, perhaps Windows update or I installed som driver/software, whatever reason. Back in Windows 10 after reboot I start BOINC and now I can see that while all 64 tasks are still running, the increase in percentage of most tasks is very slow. Mostly this seems to affect OPN WUs, but I am not 100% certain on this. I hear on my fans that they are not ramping up very high so I go to HWInfo64 again and while CPU usage is 100% on all cores, the temperature (Tdie) is 58-63 C and the reported wattage is 220-230W "only". Now, here's the really interesting part: If I leave it crunching this way, then as WUs finish (which takes a long time since they progress slower) and new ones start, I gradually see that the power draw of the CPU increases: 240W->260W->285W->etc up to the usual 320-340W. This process takes many hours. As it progresses, the fans ramp up and temps rise etc until it is back to steady-state at full-steam ahead. Has anyone else notices this? I currently crunch OPN1, MCM1 and some ARP1. The system is overclocked and is stable, producing valid results only and no crashes. CPU: AMD 2990WX @ 3.55GHz all-core RAM: 64GB (4x16GB) quad channel corsair LPX 3200Mhz 16-19-19-19-36-1T @ 3200Mhz 14-17-17-17-34-1T @ 1.42V SSD: Samsung 970 EVO 500GB NVMe M.2 PSU: Corsair HX1200i (total power draw is about 480W) Motherboard: MSI X399 MEG Creation GPU: Palit GTX 1080 @ stock ![]() Join The International Team: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=CK9RP1BKX1 AMD TR2990WX @ PBO, 64GB Quad 3200MHz 14-17-17-17-1T, RX6900XT @ Stock AMD 3800X @ PBO AMD 2700X @ 4GHz |
||
|
jay_Orlando
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 4, 2006 Post Count: 181 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi There,
----------------------------------------Resonding ia late December to a September post. Hope you are still 'there'. I saw this: The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 3.0 GHz 32-Core sTR4 Processor from AMD is a powerful 32-core processor with 64 threads, I have an older AMD (8 core) and a single WU can keep a 'core' at 100%. Maybe multiple threads are slower when 100% crunching. I would suggest settin Number of CPUs to 31 and listen and note CPU utilization. try the Windows task manager and see how it rports % utilization. Hope this helps. Jay PS perhaps thge speed-up is due to WUs finishing and reducing the threads/cor ratio?? PPS Ever want to try Linux? I hvae had WU finish faster on Linux. ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by jay_Orlando at Dec 27, 2020 8:43:12 PM] |
||
|
|
![]() |