Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 8
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2519 times and has 7 replies Next Thread
kirkgg
Cruncher
Joined: Feb 4, 2019
Post Count: 1
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

Hey. Is it possible to implement the function of adding information about individual results to the badges? (in the form of a list of publications (preferably with links to publications (DOI)) indicating the share of participation in %), similar to how it is implemented in the project (GPU GRID)
Participants are kindly asked to show interest! Sincerely kirkgg
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by kirkgg at Sep 7, 2020 1:51:08 PM]
[Sep 7, 2020 1:43:50 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

Hey. Is it possible to implement the function of adding information about individual results to the badges? (in the form of a list of publications (preferably with links to publications (DOI)) indicating the share of participation in %), similar to how it is implemented in the project (GPU GRID)
Participants are kindly asked to show interest! Sincerely kirkgg

Is the share of participation for the points, the results, or the time ? These figures can be easily calculated by each individual use if they so desire. I really don't see the need to put it on a badge or otherwise publish it. I am speculating that for most individual members the numbers as expressed in a percentage form would involve quite small decimals. For instance, with Open Pandemics, the total number of units done is about 110,000,000 so 1% would be 1,100,000. Given the average time of about 3 hours, this would imply about 3,300,000 hours of computing time which is about 376 2/3 years of computing. There may be a few individuals who have computer farms big enough to reach this level, but not too many I think.
I think people do as much as they are able and most people do not want to brag about how much they have done. If they do, they can just post it in the fora for others to see.
So, frankly I do not see this as necessary.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Sep 7, 2020 3:01:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

I recall something about work units/tasks being "anonymized" before being sent to the researchers, and therefore cannot be linked to a specific volunteer.

Maybe I'm wrong.

Regardless, badges and runtime serve their purpose. If you crunched for a project, your results counted, whether they ascertained a certain compound did not work on a certain region of a protein, or if they ascertained it worked.

But you won't ever know that.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Sep 7, 2020 3:55:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BladeD
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 28976
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

I recall something about work units/tasks being "anonymized" before being sent to the researchers, and therefore cannot be linked to a specific volunteer.

Maybe I'm wrong.

Regardless, badges and runtime serve their purpose. If you crunched for a project, your results counted, whether they ascertained a certain compound did not work on a certain region of a protein, or if they ascertained it worked.

But you won't ever know that.

It doesn't matter for this part....

in the form of a list of publications (preferably with links to publications (DOI))

----------------------------------------
[Sep 7, 2020 4:01:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

I don't see it happening.

WCG always says they have lots to do and in something like this, they'll likely just refer you to the News Section.

Maybe Caitilarkin will chime in.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Sep 7, 2020 4:44:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BladeD
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 28976
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

I don't see it happening.

WCG always says they have lots to do and in something like this, they'll likely just refer you to the News Section.

Maybe Caitilarkin will chime in.

Of course it won't, but that doesn't mean it's not a good idea.
----------------------------------------
[Sep 7, 2020 4:53:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
cjslman
Master Cruncher
Mexico
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
Post Count: 2082
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

My 2 cents worth (probably a rehash of the above)...
1) The WCG team is very busy with project related activities: getting another weather project going + enabling GPU for OPN + maintaining the WCG site + interfacing with project scientists/universities + etc. So being realistic, this will have very low priority.
2) The percentage of most of the crunchers would be extremely low and as Sgt.Joe stated, with a lot of decimal places after the period. In my case, I have returned 2,387 results (which I'm proud about) vs the total amount returned by the project so far: 110,725,826. That turns out to be 0.002%... hard to put on a small icon.
3) A good alternative is SNRUK's signature, which has a world of information about a cruncher's effort and can be added to any/most internet communication mediums.

CJSL
Crunching on the thin ice of a new day...
----------------------------------------
I follow the Gimli philosophy: "Keep breathing. That's the key. Breathe."
Join The Cahuamos Team


[Sep 7, 2020 11:47:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1684
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Suggestion: Supplementing information about personal contribution to projects!

If I do properly understand the initial request: BOINCstats is calculation such percentages.
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by KerSamson at Sep 8, 2020 10:32:54 AM]
[Sep 8, 2020 10:32:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread