| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 8
|
|
| Author |
|
|
kirkgg
Cruncher Joined: Feb 4, 2019 Post Count: 1 Status: Offline |
Hey. Is it possible to implement the function of adding information about individual results to the badges? (in the form of a list of publications (preferably with links to publications (DOI)) indicating the share of participation in %), similar to how it is implemented in the project (GPU GRID)
----------------------------------------Participants are kindly asked to show interest! Sincerely kirkgg [Edit 1 times, last edit by kirkgg at Sep 7, 2020 1:51:08 PM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hey. Is it possible to implement the function of adding information about individual results to the badges? (in the form of a list of publications (preferably with links to publications (DOI)) indicating the share of participation in %), similar to how it is implemented in the project (GPU GRID) Participants are kindly asked to show interest! Sincerely kirkgg Is the share of participation for the points, the results, or the time ? These figures can be easily calculated by each individual use if they so desire. I really don't see the need to put it on a badge or otherwise publish it. I am speculating that for most individual members the numbers as expressed in a percentage form would involve quite small decimals. For instance, with Open Pandemics, the total number of units done is about 110,000,000 so 1% would be 1,100,000. Given the average time of about 3 hours, this would imply about 3,300,000 hours of computing time which is about 376 2/3 years of computing. There may be a few individuals who have computer farms big enough to reach this level, but not too many I think. I think people do as much as they are able and most people do not want to brag about how much they have done. If they do, they can just post it in the fora for others to see. So, frankly I do not see this as necessary. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I recall something about work units/tasks being "anonymized" before being sent to the researchers, and therefore cannot be linked to a specific volunteer.
----------------------------------------Maybe I'm wrong. Regardless, badges and runtime serve their purpose. If you crunched for a project, your results counted, whether they ascertained a certain compound did not work on a certain region of a protein, or if they ascertained it worked. But you won't ever know that. ![]() - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I recall something about work units/tasks being "anonymized" before being sent to the researchers, and therefore cannot be linked to a specific volunteer. Maybe I'm wrong. Regardless, badges and runtime serve their purpose. If you crunched for a project, your results counted, whether they ascertained a certain compound did not work on a certain region of a protein, or if they ascertained it worked. But you won't ever know that. It doesn't matter for this part.... in the form of a list of publications (preferably with links to publications (DOI)) |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I don't see it happening.
----------------------------------------WCG always says they have lots to do and in something like this, they'll likely just refer you to the News Section. Maybe Caitilarkin will chime in. ![]() - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I don't see it happening. WCG always says they have lots to do and in something like this, they'll likely just refer you to the News Section. Maybe Caitilarkin will chime in. Of course it won't, but that doesn't mean it's not a good idea. |
||
|
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
My 2 cents worth (probably a rehash of the above)...
----------------------------------------1) The WCG team is very busy with project related activities: getting another weather project going + enabling GPU for OPN + maintaining the WCG site + interfacing with project scientists/universities + etc. So being realistic, this will have very low priority. 2) The percentage of most of the crunchers would be extremely low and as Sgt.Joe stated, with a lot of decimal places after the period. In my case, I have returned 2,387 results (which I'm proud about) vs the total amount returned by the project so far: 110,725,826. That turns out to be 0.002%... hard to put on a small icon. 3) A good alternative is SNRUK's signature, which has a world of information about a cruncher's effort and can be added to any/most internet communication mediums. CJSL Crunching on the thin ice of a new day... |
||
|
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1684 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
If I do properly understand the initial request: BOINCstats is calculation such percentages.
----------------------------------------Cheers, Yves ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by KerSamson at Sep 8, 2020 10:32:54 AM] |
||
|
|
|