| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Chat Room
Thread: How is the work of Anonymous counted? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 7
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well, yes, how is the work of Anonymous counted towards a team Anonymous has joined?
 I have Sawyer's Cancer Fighting Network in mind, because this team has a goal of 1,000 years by September. All the time many Anonymous have worked there and more have joined just recently as a result of management's article about the team.  But how is Anonymous' work counted? We may be closer to Sawyer's goal than we know ....  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Same as everyone else's. All work done while being member of a team, you just don't see the numbers printed simply because 'by line' numbers allows correlating back to an individual, defeating the GPDR requirement. That said, if there would only be 1 anonymous member, take total minus printed member contribution and you'd have what one anonymous contributed. Here the total of the dozens I see now.
----------------------------------------Edit: You just know by the position of the first 2 anonymites between widdershines and supdood, that each contributed somewhere between 280-313 days till now. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 19, 2020 8:52:30 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thank you for replying, lavaflow.
Only  I do not get it ....  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Don't be cranial, just accept the total of now 508 years is correct and includes all work done by anonymouses while member of Team Sawyer.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
 Well, not being one that 'just accepts' I did a probability addition of the non-anonymous and am now ready to accept that they are included in the total  Thank you for guiding me, lavaflow  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
So you did what I told you in my first reply. All those CPU cycles spend on working this, which is so glaringly evident. 😝
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I simply did not understand your first answer, lavaflow
- and I wasted no CPU cycles as my head cannot crunch  |
||
|
|
|