Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 133
Posts: 133   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 30228 times and has 132 replies Next Thread
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Jim, with run times that short, download and upload times become important. What are they like?

Don't know. You don't have something like BOINC to tell you that. But as soon as one ends, another one starts, so I guess it is fast enough.

But I have 110 Mbps down/15 Mbps up cable modem, so it could be an issue on a slow connection. However, my impression is that they are small files.

Mine is more like 7 Mbps down/1 Mbps up, which looks fast enough for most BOINC projects. Not GPUGRID, though, if it starts doing much again.
[Jul 22, 2020 3:19:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mgpointner
Advanced Cruncher
Argentina
Joined: Nov 16, 2009
Post Count: 55
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

FYI.

A paper describing the OpenCL implementation and evaluation of AutoDock-GPU was uploaded as a preprint in ChemRxiv

https://chemrxiv.org/articles/Accelerating_Au...ased_Local_Search/9702389
----------------------------------------

[Jul 23, 2020 11:09:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Aurum
Master Cruncher
The Great Basin
Joined: Dec 24, 2017
Post Count: 2391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Thanks for the link to:
Accelerating AUTODOCK4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search
Diogo Santos-Martins1, Leonardo Solis-Vasquez1, Andreas Koch and Stefano Forlia
Sure wish we could run some of these WUs. When might that happen???
----------------------------------------

...KRI please cancel all shadow-banning
[Jul 24, 2020 3:58:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Sadly, we had no updates this week regarding GPU's.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jul 24, 2020 7:56:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Thanks for the link to:
Accelerating AUTODOCK4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search
Diogo Santos-Martins1, Leonardo Solis-Vasquez1, Andreas Koch and Stefano Forlia
Sure wish we could run some of these WUs. When might that happen???

I've read that AUTODOCK is being developed it two different directions - one to allow GPU use, and one to add support for COVID-19 work, It will be more likely to happen AFTER someone combines those two sets of changes into a new version.
[Jul 25, 2020 3:02:00 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Martin Schnellinger
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 128
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
rose Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Thank you very much, robertmiles, for your post.
To me, this post, this thread and especially the paper here:
https://chemrxiv.org/articles/Accelerating_Au...ased_Local_Search/9702389

seem to be really important.

Knowing little about coding it is hard to give some good advice, but let me nonetheless
say the following:

It seems to me, that it would be good to carry out the process of porting autodock to
GPU usability very thoroughly.

This case of porting a BOINC sub program (i.e. autodock) to GPU could serve as a model case. I whish that we would take the time to write a good handbook with the title:

"How to port Programms distributed computing programms to GPU"


Let us not forget, that there are prgramms for distributed other than outodock.

If we had a good handbook on porting programms to GPU available, it will be a lot easieer to port other and future distributed computing programms from CPU to GPU.

In my view, all projects on BOINC should be able to use GPU power.

And with a good handbook on how to adapt them all from GPU this process
of porting them would much much easier.

If there was such a handbook, less talented programmers could take part.

I ask for comments, please.

Links to already existing handbooks on programming code for GPU are very welcome.

[Jul 25, 2020 5:14:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

AutoDock for GPU's is completed and we know that WCG already has that code. And there is no specific AutoDock for SARS-CoV-2, simply AutoDock 4.2.6 with a new "Reactive Docking" protocol that doesn't seem to be specific to any virus.

AFAIK.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jul 25, 2020 11:01:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

[snip]

This case of porting a BOINC sub program (i.e. autodock) to GPU could serve as a model case. I whish that we would take the time to write a good handbook with the title:

"How to port Programms distributed computing programms to GPU"


Let us not forget, that there are prgramms for distributed other than outodock.

If we had a good handbook on porting programms to GPU available, it will be a lot easieer to port other and future distributed computing programms from CPU to GPU.

Sections needed to such a handbook:
How to program in a Linux environment if you have never used Linux before
How to program for BOINC
How to program for CUDA
How to attach a CUDA program to a BOINC application
How to program for OpenCL
How to attach an OpenCL program to a BOINC application
How to set up a Linux server for BOINC if you have never used Linux before

In my view, all projects on BOINC should be able to use GPU power.

If you don't care how fast. For programs where you can't find enough groups of steps that can be done simultaneously because they don't write to any location used by a different step, the GPU version can actually be SLOWER than the CPU version, since the GPU's clock is typically about a quarter of the speed of the CPU's clock. Add a section for identifying groups of this kind.

And with a good handbook on how to adapt them all from GPU this process
of porting them would much much easier.

If there was such a handbook, less talented programmers could take part.

I ask for comments, please.

Links to already existing handbooks on programming code for GPU are very welcome.

I've already taken a class in CUDA, and can identify SOME of the groups of items that can be done in parallel, so I can do PART of the work. Only for Nvidia GPUs, so far.

I'm still looking for an online class in OpenCL at a reasonable price.

Let me know if you get the other sections needed.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by robertmiles at Jul 26, 2020 3:54:10 AM]
[Jul 26, 2020 3:44:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

AutoDock for GPU's is completed and we know that WCG already has that code. And there is no specific AutoDock for SARS-CoV-2, simply AutoDock 4.2.6 with a new "Reactive Docking" protocol that doesn't seem to be specific to any virus.

AFAIK.

So, combine AutoDock for GPU's with AutoDock 4.2.6 with a new "Reactive Docking" protocol to produce a new version that does both.
[Jul 26, 2020 3:57:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

AutoDock for GPU's is completed and we know that WCG already has that code. And there is no specific AutoDock for SARS-CoV-2, simply AutoDock 4.2.6 with a new "Reactive Docking" protocol that doesn't seem to be specific to any virus.

AFAIK.

So, combine AutoDock for GPU's with AutoDock 4.2.6 with a new "Reactive Docking" protocol to produce a new version that does both.


Which has been done. The AutoDock OpenCL/CUDA they created is AutoDock 4 and they ported reactive docking and whatever other protocols they needed to that application. They also updated the AD4 code on the GPU side with new algorithms that make it faster and more accurate for larger molecules which I guess could some day be applied to the standard CPU app.

We just need an update from the WCG techs to know how the implementation process is looking like.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jul 26, 2020 8:01:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 133   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread