Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 133
Posts: 133   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 30213 times and has 132 replies Next Thread
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Those all seem to be well-targeted approaches with some idea of the likely vulnerabilities. OPN is a broad-brush approach in the hope of getting some otherwise overlooked hits. But it had better be a fast brush, or the problem will be all wrapped up it seems.
[Jun 18, 2020 4:32:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Aurum
Master Cruncher
The Great Basin
Joined: Dec 24, 2017
Post Count: 2391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Forli's approach sounds more focused than the ones in that article. Suicide inhibitors may be the best idea going.
----------------------------------------

...KRI please cancel all shadow-banning
[Jun 18, 2020 6:21:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

OK, but I don't see where he mentions suicide inhibitors in that tweet.
[Jun 18, 2020 6:41:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

OK, but I don't see where he mentions suicide inhibitors in that tweet.


I think Aurum means this: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,42374 and this https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg...ad,42230_offset,30#624291


On the topic of GPU's, I think/hope we see BETA in July. On the FAAH2 updates thread, WCG mentions the GPU version of AutoDock and that they expect to receive more information in "the next few weeks". They seem to progressing really well with their development too.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jun 18, 2020 7:14:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Aurum
Master Cruncher
The Great Basin
Joined: Dec 24, 2017
Post Count: 2391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Yes that's exactly what I meant.
So do I have to get a tweeter account to follow Forli's progress?
----------------------------------------

...KRI please cancel all shadow-banning
[Jun 18, 2020 9:46:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

Yes that's exactly what I meant.
So do I have to get a tweeter account to follow Forli's progress?


You could just bookmark https://twitter.com/ForliLab and check every now and then.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jun 18, 2020 10:47:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1326
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

When the GPU client was introduced for "Help Conquer Cancer" it took roughly 6 months to complete the project tasks returned per day were about 1.25 million so I am guessing it will be around the 2 million mark per day. Just thought I would pass on my knowledge on how fast the GPU client can increase the speed of a project.
My preference would also be to support the fastest possible architecture for both AMD and Nvidia. I have a Nvidia RTX 2070
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Speedy51 at Jun 22, 2020 11:11:59 PM]
[Jun 22, 2020 10:05:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BladeD
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 28976
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

----------------------------------------
[Jun 24, 2020 11:09:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[VENETO] boboviz
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Aug 17, 2008
Post Count: 184
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

" the Nvidia cards on CUDA always did the best."
That's strange!
[Jun 25, 2020 2:36:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

" the Nvidia cards on CUDA always did the best."
That's strange!

Only to people who don't have Nvidia cards.
[Jun 25, 2020 4:37:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 133   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread