Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 133
Posts: 133   Pages: 14   [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 30240 times and has 132 replies Next Thread
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Post Count: 728
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

There, it's started.
If it happens I'd like to vote for nVidia OpenCL 1.2
Thanks
----------------------------------------

Currently being moderated under false pretences
[Jun 1, 2020 4:26:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jun 1, 2020 9:34:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
incendar.com
Cruncher
United States
Joined: May 21, 2020
Post Count: 6
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

If they need billion WUs they need GPU...
----------------------------------------
Gamer Incendar.com
[Jun 3, 2020 6:41:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
yoerik
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Mar 24, 2020
Post Count: 413
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

yep. That's why they're working on it. We'll just have to hope it comes sooner than it does later.
----------------------------------------

[Jun 3, 2020 6:44:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Stiwi
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: May 19, 2012
Post Count: 75
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

The GPU-Code seems to be OpenSource if someone wanted to help
https://github.com/ccsb-scripps/AutoDock-GPU
[Jun 6, 2020 11:42:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

If it happens I'd like to vote for nVidia OpenCL 1.2

They will get there faster with CUDA, which is what Quarantine@Home is using for their Autodock project.
https://quarantine.infino.me/

It looks like Nvidia has done the hard work for them:
https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker
[Jun 8, 2020 6:13:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

If it happens I'd like to vote for nVidia OpenCL 1.2

They will get there faster with CUDA,

No you won't because you will have eliminated everyone who has an AMD card from participating and because Nvidia cripples their FP64 functions on everything except their very expensive high end commercial use cards.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by nanoprobe at Jun 9, 2020 1:56:20 AM]
[Jun 9, 2020 1:52:15 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

No you won't because you will have eliminated everyone who has an AMD card from participating and because Nvidia cripples their FP64 functions on everything except their very expensive high end commercial use cards.

I used my Nvidia cards on Quarantine and a GTX 1070 was over 20 times faster than the CPU version. There are plenty of Nvidia cards. They won't need AMD. They will run out of work fast.

Thus far, the GPU version is Linux only. Most AMD cards have problems getting the drivers installed. I know, I have an RX 570, which is probably the easiest to do. Unless they get it to work on Windows, a further delay, there won't be many AMD crunchers anyway.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 3 times, last edit by Jim1348 at Jun 9, 2020 10:38:58 AM]
[Jun 9, 2020 10:25:03 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

No you won't because you will have eliminated everyone who has an AMD card from participating and because Nvidia cripples their FP64 functions on everything except their very expensive high end commercial use cards.

I used my Nvidia cards on Quarantine and a GTX 1070 was over 20 times faster than the CPU version. There are plenty of Nvidia cards. They won't need AMD. They will run out of work fast.

Thus far, the GPU version is Linux only. Most AMD cards have problems getting the drivers installed. I know, I have an RX 570, which is probably the easiest to do. Unless they get it to work on Windows, a further delay, there won't be many AMD crunchers anyway.

I know gpus are much faster. I ran the only gpu project here. The weakest AMD card was faster than the best Nvidiia card because of the crippled FP64 functions on Nvidia and their OpenCl support was awful. Things have certainly changed since then but IMHO it would be a huge mistake to exclude AMD.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Jun 9, 2020 3:19:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Mandatory "Request for Project to be Ported to GPU" Thread

You are thinking of a past project, where I expect they had only an OpenCl version. On the projects I have run where the have had both CUDA and OpenCl, the Nvidia cards on CUDA always did the best.

The only GPU project I know of that extensively uses dual-precision is MilkyWay. Even there, it is the older AMD cards that do best. The newer AMD cards are much weaker in DP (though better than Nvidia).

I am not sure that Autdock on the GPU uses DP much, if at all. As I said, I saw a 20x speedup. If you are expecting much more than that on AMD just because some of them have better DP specs, I think you are waiting for a lost cause. There is a reason that Autodock on the GPU was developed with CUDA. If they had wanted OpenCl, they would have done it.
[Jun 9, 2020 7:32:50 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 133   Pages: 14   [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread