Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 7
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2312 times and has 6 replies Next Thread
highwind
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
Post Count: 56
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Task Run Time

I am currently running COVID19 on my 3900X overclocking it to 4.25Ghz,

I noticed that most tasks are finished within 105 mins but there are always a few tasks running north of 140 mins. This is also being observed on my laptop 7700HQ where most tasks are done within 3 hours and some are north of 4 hours.

This is quite inconsistent with other project like MCM where all tasks are finished within 90 mins on my 3900X.

Anyone seeing the see same thing?
[Jun 1, 2020 12:04:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Task Run Time

Yes, the work units are not all the same length. Some dockings are more complicated.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jun 1, 2020 12:13:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
yoerik
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Mar 24, 2020
Post Count: 413
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Task Run Time

yep. On android (where runtimes are far longer) - I've noticed some run twice as fast as others. Some take 8 - others take well over 12 on my phone - on my old phone and tablet - some run in 15, some run 20+. You should see the differences if you look at the result log after they're complete - of course, once the stats update is done.
----------------------------------------

[Jun 1, 2020 12:20:35 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1326
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Task Run Time

I did an experiment with hyperthreading on verse off using same CPU running Windows. I found with out HT a task would take 1.00 hour with HT on a job would take about 1.70 hours.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Speedy51 at Jun 20, 2020 5:35:13 AM]
[Jun 1, 2020 2:40:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
DrMason
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Mar 16, 2007
Post Count: 153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Task Run Time

I also did some tests on hyperthreading, but with amd epyc processors running linux mint. There, after I disabled hyperthreading, I found that tasks finished just barely more than twice as fast as with hyperthreading on. So, on some architectures and operating systems, it appears that hyperthreading (while great for getting those badges) actually produces less overall work. Maybe the fact that it's using less power and producing less heat means that the processors are able to boost a little better? I'm not sure, so I'd encourage people to do some experiments and see what works best for them.
----------------------------------------

[Jun 1, 2020 3:16:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bobzilla
Cruncher
Joined: May 31, 2020
Post Count: 31
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
biggrin Re: Task Run Time

Don't know if this helps or not but I also have a 3900x with 64gb ram. I keep it stock mainly because Im afraid to overclock and mess something up. My run times are 1hr 20min to 1hr 57min I guess it varies on what it's working on. It runs 24 at a time, and I have selected to do 1 day work and download 2nd day work so I always have plenty to do. Hope this helps, sorry if it doesn't.

Quick edit: Just looked at actual times. they range from 1 hr 2 mins to 1 hr 52 mins and that is for 24 ready to report. i am starting to think that it's not JUST the CPU alone that lowers the time, but maybe the available ram for each thread to compile the task that they work on?

Remember: With beer, all things are possible. Some of which, probably should not be tried.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Bobzilla at Jun 1, 2020 6:04:57 AM]
[Jun 1, 2020 5:48:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1403
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Task Run Time

Since running 4 tasks on my 8-threaded Android, the total runtimes are rather consistent between 5 and 6 hours.
The inside number of jobs and dockings varies more:
ZINC001362836299-ACR3.38_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111_wcgsplit3.dpf(Job #0)...	10 # Dockings	Total sec.
ZINC001050793163-ACR3.32_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #1). 50
ZINC000366223081-ACR3.36_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #2)... 24 84 19380.39525

ZINC001321320755-ACR3.29_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111_wcgsplit3.dpf(Job #0)... 9
ZINC001269297695-ACR3.29_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #1)... 50
ZINC000268557973-ACR3.29_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #2)... 3 62 19361.64028

ZINC000366223081-ACR3.36_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111_wcgsplit2.dpf(Job #0)... 26
ZINC000366564349-ACR3.27_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #1)... 30 56 19205.33988

ZINC001050922562-ACR3.34_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111_wcgsplit2.dpf(Job #0)... 7
ZINC000616212392-ACR3.37_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #1)... 50
ZINC001362837512-ACR3.30_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #2)... 50
ZINC000616320240-ACR3.40_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #3)... 50
ZINC000633617117-ACR3.24_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #4)... 50
ZINC000337882914-ACR3.27_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #5)... 50
ZINC001050816171-ACR3.36_RX1--6w9c_001_tyr264-HO--CYS111.dpf(Job #6)... 2 259 18395.935

Job #0 seems to be most of the time a remnant from a previous task done by someone else.
[Jun 1, 2020 7:36:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread