Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 2
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1144 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Team data should be accurate, or teams should be scrapped.

Subject line pretty much says it all.

The current "database" is full of flagrant inaccuracies. "All-Time Members" is a lie. "Retired Members" is a lie.

Blaming GDPR regulations for WCG's inability to keep a database properly is utterly ludicrous. If members have to be retired from the database after a period of inactivity, they should be added to the "Retired" total and their contributions still shown as part of all totals.

For a scientific data site to be so utterly inaccurate is a disgrace. You should either display data that is accurate, or scrap the whole thing.
[Dec 19, 2019 9:53:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Team data should be accurate, or teams should be scrapped.

In addition to "gone", retired can also mean that they are no longer on one team and reappeared elsewhere.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
[Dec 24, 2019 11:42:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread