| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 2
|
|
| Author |
|
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Over the past 3 weeks I noticed that BONIC has gotten much better (within 10min of predicting elapsed time remaining to crunch ARP. Maybe their consistent size allows them to estimate time to compute based on previous WU. When I started crunching ARP the estimates were wildly optimistic.
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by dcs1955 at Nov 22, 2019 5:04:36 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Actually, the FPOPS in the task headers of new tasks are drawn from returned results at WCG, which is the basis to calculate the estimation, also using the benchmark tags stored on your client.
----------------------------------------<p_fpops>2547132783.235671</p_fpops> <p_iops>9195472079.934233</p_iops> This generic benchmark is taken periodically to test how well your computer does. If you change the CPU clock speed, the numbers after a test should go up/down too. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 22, 2019 8:34:19 AM] |
||
|
|
|