Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 14
Posts: 14   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3302 times and has 13 replies Next Thread
jayrope
Cruncher
Joined: Jul 23, 2016
Post Count: 47
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Smallest WUs on WCG?

I am interested in crunching the smallest WUs from WCG. Momentarily FAHV doesn't seem to supply any new ones.
Which of the remaining projects supply the smallest WUs then?

Thanx much for any advice.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by jayrope at Sep 30, 2017 4:50:57 PM]
[Sep 30, 2017 4:50:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 29, 2005
Post Count: 295
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

Most likely Smash Childhood Cancer.

You can check duration times for CPUs at the following site:
http://wuprop.boinc-af.org/results/duree.py
[Oct 1, 2017 2:25:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

You have the same access to project stats as anyone else.

Go to the Community section, link up top. Drill into projects, then daily history. Simple math will yield average time per WU.
[Oct 1, 2017 3:16:08 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jayrope
Cruncher
Joined: Jul 23, 2016
Post Count: 47
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

Thanx guys, so there isn't an already existing chart about this stating clear info for WC projects WUs, i suppose. (?)
[Oct 1, 2017 6:40:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

I read the answer as no ready-to-eat-meals, but:
1. Dig the information out from the place, the man pointed to
2. Get out your abacus
3. Sit down in a quiet corner
4. Turn TV off
5. Do a math session
6. Share your findings with us lazy ones, please

You can do it, jayrope peace
Nice to have you on board smile

[Oct 1, 2017 9:01:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7847
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

Thanx guys, so there isn't an already existing chart about this stating clear info for WC projects WUs, i suppose. (?)

OK, here you go. These are the average length of the work units for the current projects(not including FAAH - project not currently issuing new units) calculated using the last 30 days. All figures are in hours.
Microbiome 2.03
SCC1 1.44
Zika 1.88
TB 10.57
FAAH2 11.12
OET 1.72
MCM 4.07

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Oct 2, 2017 2:52:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

I have not studied this in depth, but it seems my Ebolas take some 10-12 hours after which they stay put
- as if not wanting to leave -
for some 2-8 hours at 100%.
My Zikas take some 16-18 hours, but they leave the nest right after that.
Nothing seems to go as fast on my "devices" as you state, Capt. Joe sad

[Oct 2, 2017 7:19:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

[Oct 2, 2017 8:39:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

Sorry, SekeRob****, the link leads to the Photobucket message that in essence says:
shhh Swiping your VISA seems to be a hard thing for you to do
- as it does for all my old hosted pictures as well blushing
idea Tried myself uploading to a Facebook account and linked to that
- and it worked.
So far coffee
coffee
[Oct 2, 2017 10:07:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7847
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smallest WUs on WCG?

I have not studied this in depth, but it seems my Ebolas take some 10-12 hours after which they stay put
- as if not wanting to leave -
for some 2-8 hours at 100%.
My Zikas take some 16-18 hours, but they leave the nest right after that.
Nothing seems to go as fast on my "devices" as you state, Capt. Joe sad

These are merely averages calculated off of all the returns for the last 30 days. I believe you are crunching on an android device (phone ?) which is going to be much slower than the average. There are some crunching on pretty high end machines and they will be considerably faster than the averages. Don't be discouraged by a slow device, every work unit crunched counts.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Oct 2, 2017 12:25:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 14   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread