| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: FightAIDS@Home
Thread: Too Late |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5
|
|
| Author |
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2070 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Noticed a Too Late entry in one of the results sent back:
----------------------------------------FAHV_1001095_3j3y-_b-P4_Rigid_5389_4-- Linux 734 Valid 2/3/17 09:49:43 2/4/17 01:11:46 2.04 76.5/104.3 WUs _0 and _1 were sent by WCG at 17:54-55 on 30-01-2017. Since WU _0 was User Aborted, WU _2 was sent by WCG at 19:32 on 30-01-2017 with a deadline of 07:32 on 03-02-2017 (which you can tell from the Sent Time of WU _3). However, WU _2 was only returned at 02:43 on 04-02-2017, one hour and 32 minutes later than WU _4 was returned (at 01:11 on 04-02-2017). I think this means that a WU, if it's being returned past the deadline, has to be returned before the last wingman sends a completed result. FAHV_1001095_3j3y-_b-P4_Rigid_5391_4-- Linux 734 Valid 2/3/17 09:49:39 2/3/17 15:03:25 2.08 91.0/96.0 Here, WU _2 is being returned 7 hours and 15 minutes later than the last completed WU, _4. [Edit 2 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Feb 4, 2017 1:16:56 PM] |
||
|
|
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher The Great State of Texas Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 1053 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My question is this:
----------------------------------------How can a WU be Too Late if it's returned before the 2nd is sent out? FAHV_ 1003836_ 3j3y-_ 2-P1_ 9078_ 1--734 Valid 7/17/17 15:33:49 7/18/17 19:45:20 0.04 2.1 / 2.1 FAHV_ 1003836_ 3j3y-_ 2-P1_ 9078_ 0--734 Too Late 7/17/17 11:01:18 7/17/17 15:33:02 Mine is _0 Oh Well Onward I Crunch     |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
There are some unusual uses of the "Too Late" status designation - see the FAQ.
|
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2070 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
@PecosRiverM,
"Too Late" is certainly baffling in this situation: your _0 WU was reported back to the server and then it was sent to a wingman as a _1 WU, so it can't really be too late. According to the FAQ: "Occasionally a result previously marked Pending Validation has the distribution stopped due to too many errors, without a complete quorum [max errors varies per science]. The non-error results are then converted to the status Too Late." As the WCG system outage happened on the 18th of July and the wingman's result was turned in at around the time of the outage, there is a big chance that your _0 WU has been marked Pending Validation originally (causing it to be sent to a wingman) and after the outage that PVal status was changed into "Too Late". Don't despair though: "Credit is granted as claimed [with delay]. Internally these task results are moved to a take-out list, for later review. Also see the Pending Validation status." |
||
|
|
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher The Great State of Texas Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 1053 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Oh I'm not worried. Thanks All
---------------------------------------- It was just abit funny on the "use" of "Too Late".  |
||
|
|
|