Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 17
Posts: 17   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4093 times and has 16 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Recent Invalids

Something strange?

I've just got a new machine and I'm running Ubuntu for the first time. It's been running Zika just fine, but it ran a couple of FAH2 WUs for the first time yesterday and I see this morning that they're both flagged Invalid. Looking at the wingmen it seems they got the same thing, though the logs look normal. Do we have some bad WUs out there or is there a problem with the validator, or is my new machine not up to scratch?

Here they are:

Project Name: FightAIDS@Home - Phase 2
Created: 12/08/2016 20:47:29
Name: FAH2_000819_zinc00078906_000001_0001_001
Minimum Quorum: 1
Replication: 3

Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000001_ 0001_ 001_ 4-- Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 - In Progress 09/12/16 16:56:16 13/12/16 16:56:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000001_ 0001_ 001_ 3-- Linux 3.10.60-std441-amd64 - Detached 09/12/16 16:50:45 09/12/16 16:56:13 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000001_ 0001_ 001_ 2-- Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 - Detached 09/12/16 16:48:35 09/12/16 16:50:41 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000001_ 0001_ 001_ 1-- Linux 4.4.0-31-generic 715 Invalid 09/12/16 16:48:27 10/12/16 07:12:48 12.45 403.8 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000001_ 0001_ 001_ 0-- Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 715 Invalid 08/12/16 20:47:45 09/12/16 16:48:09 19.32 445.5 / 0.0

Project Name: FightAIDS@Home - Phase 2
Created: 12/08/2016 20:47:28
Name: FAH2_000819_zinc00078906_000007_0006_001
Minimum Quorum: 1
Replication: 3

Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000007_ 0006_ 001_ 4-- Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 - In Progress 10/12/16 05:05:48 14/12/16 05:05:48 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000007_ 0006_ 001_ 3-- Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 - In Progress 09/12/16 15:22:16 13/12/16 15:22:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000007_ 0006_ 001_ 2-- Linux 4.8.0-1-amd64 715 Error 09/12/16 15:19:20 09/12/16 15:22:11 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000007_ 0006_ 001_ 1-- Linux 4.4.0-31-generic 715 Invalid 09/12/16 15:19:00 10/12/16 05:05:43 11.69 379.2 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000819_ zinc00078906_ 000007_ 0006_ 001_ 0-- Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 715 Invalid 08/12/16 20:47:45 09/12/16 15:18:07 17.81 411.7 / 0.0
[Dec 10, 2016 10:41:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 766
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

Unlikely to be anything wrong with your PC.
The few units I have had recently have been invalid for all.

Paul.
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[Dec 10, 2016 11:04:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

Thanks, Paul.

Sounds like it's one for the techs to look at on Monday.
[Dec 10, 2016 11:33:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

You can apply a Boolean 'True or False ' test to the observation... from my hunting tool, just the raw 'show all fahb' filter applied, found 6, all 6 valid.

ResultName "App
Name" Status Claimed CpuTime Time ElapsedTime Granted Crd/Hr "Efficien
cy" Outcome ReceivedTime ServerState ValidateState Last Mod Stats_Period
FAH2_000358_avx628080-ls_000067_0003_036_2 fahb Valid 312.05 21.8060 0:21:48:22 21.8721 312.05 14.31 99.70% 1 09-12-16 04:27:44 5 1 09-12-16 04:27:57 16-12-09 12:06
FAH2_000357_avx628073-ls_000007_0003_038_2 fahb Valid 306.06 21.7020 0:21:42:07 21.7717 306.06 14.10 99.68% 1 09-12-16 04:20:39 5 1 09-12-16 04:20:52 16-12-09 12:06
FAH2_000330_avx387872-ls_000068_0000_039_2 fahb Valid 340.44 24.4145 1:00:24:52 24.4762 340.44 13.94 99.75% 1 08-12-16 21:29:56 5 1 08-12-16 21:30:06 16-12-09 00:00
FAH2_000320_avx387847-ls_000062_0000_040_1 fahb Valid 311.64 22.6464 0:22:38:47 22.7168 311.64 13.76 99.69% 1 08-12-16 00:38:33 5 1 08-12-16 00:38:46 16-12-08 12:06
FAH2_000365_gl5243842-ls_000004_0000_040_2 fahb Valid 305.43 22.5329 0:22:31:59 22.5964 305.43 13.56 99.72% 1 07-12-16 21:46:32 5 1 07-12-16 21:46:42 16-12-08 00:00
FAH2_000367_pc2a030-ls_000061_0003_040_2 fahb Valid 295.81 22.1776 0:22:10:39 22.2361 295.81 13.34 99.74% 1 07-12-16 21:18:28 5 1 07-12-16 21:18:39 16-12-08 00:00

as in, there's devices able to complete them successfully and until then, max copies tried 5 is applied. W8/W10
[Dec 10, 2016 11:42:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

So it seems the problem is Linux-only. Perhaps even Linux 64-bit only.

Anyone else with comments?
[Dec 10, 2016 12:18:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Post Count: 881
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

FAH2_000819 tasks (and higher) are actually new tasks which were presumably going to be held up until the "asynchronous replica exchange" version of FAH2 went live, but some have been allowed out... Perhaps there's something wrong with the data files for some of these?

It's mentioned on the status page at Temple. (And that looks as if there'll be plenty of work when they do restart properly!)

By the way, I haven't seen an FAH2 task for quite a while, and certainly not one from any experiments numbered 819 or higher, so I've had no first-hand experience of these errors.
[Dec 11, 2016 7:20:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

Thanks for highlighting the experiment addition through batch 1318. It does say

"Note that due to the upcoming release of asynchronous replica exchange, these simulations may be cut short and rerun with the new protocols. "

i.e. second thoughts must have arisen to not release them under the old crunching regimen.
[Dec 11, 2016 9:39:37 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

Sounds like a beta that wasn't. At least I can stop worrying about my new machine (for the moment, anyway).

Thanks for the info everyone.
[Dec 11, 2016 9:49:15 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

819's on Windows, all invalid!
[Dec 11, 2016 1:26:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
armstrdj
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Post Count: 695
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Recent Invalids

The invalids are being caused by a workunit issue. We have stopped validation for now so no new copies are sent out. We will have to clean things up on the server then get them going again. We will update this thread as we progress.

Thanks,
armstrdj
[Dec 12, 2016 6:50:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 17   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread