Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 
World Community Grid Forums
  Category: Beta Testing
  Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
  Thread: CEP2 beta test July 25, 2016 [Issues Thread]

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 45
Posts: 45   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 10662 times and has 44 replies Next Thread
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2346
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CEP2 beta test July 25, 2016 [Issues Thread]
1 or 2 hours later than the deadline should not be a problem for you if you're the only (remaining) one to return results. I have seen a WU that was returned more than 24 hours later than the deadline and still turning Valid, while another wingman was still computing (In Progress).
The only problem (that I see) for your late WU is that its Status will move to "No Reply" for 1 or 2 hours and that the system will issue another WU and give it to the next wingman (with a new deadline). If you return your WU before that new WU will start, that new WU will befall a "Server Aborted" status (if issued in time by the Server).
----------------------------------------
[Edit 5 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Jul 30, 2016 3:22:39 PM]
[Jul 30, 2016 2:57:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[AF>Libristes]Maeda
Cruncher
Joined: Sep 1, 2011
Post Count: 43
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CEP2 beta test July 25, 2016 [Issues Thread]
Just return it, and is Valid.
Well, the remaining time estimated was somehow not very accurate ;)
[Jul 30, 2016 5:49:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CEP2 beta test July 25, 2016 [Issues Thread]
Here's an interesting odd-ball.

BETA_ E236441_ 185_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UQLRAFRHBNCBOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N.17_ s1_ 14_ 3-- Microsoft Windows 10 Core x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 700 Valid 31/07/16 12:28:15 01/08/16 01:05:17 12.29 422.6 / 510.1
BETA_ E236441_ 185_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UQLRAFRHBNCBOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N.17_ s1_ 14_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 700 Valid 29/07/16 15:35:04 31/07/16 01:03:48 18.00 448.2 / 382.6
BETA_ E236441_ 185_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UQLRAFRHBNCBOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N.17_ s1_ 14_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 700 Invalid 26/07/16 20:17:19 27/07/16 17:07:15 1.78 50.9 / 50.9
BETA_ E236441_ 185_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UQLRAFRHBNCBOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N.17_ s1_ 14_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 700 Error 26/07/16 20:17:01 29/07/16 15:35:03 2.74 119.7 / 119.7

_0 errored with exit code 195 (0xc3) on the 3rd attempt at running Job #0.
_1 exited with RC = 0x1 in Job #0 and went Invalid.
_2 hit 18 hours in Job #2 and went Valid.
_3 (mine) exited with RC = 0x1 in Job #3 and went Valid.

That looks like a complicated case for the validator!
[Aug 1, 2016 7:06:41 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CEP2 beta test July 25, 2016 [Issues Thread]
This one's not doing so well.

BETA_ E236441_ 221_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UHXUUTGPCSCBNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N.15_ s1_ 14_ 4-- Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) - In Progress 01/08/16 07:13:35 02/08/16 16:49:34 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ E236441_ 221_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UHXUUTGPCSCBNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N.15_ s1_ 14_ 3-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 700 Error 31/07/16 12:28:13 01/08/16 07:13:33 17.57 205.0 / 0.0
BETA_ E236441_ 221_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UHXUUTGPCSCBNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N.15_ s1_ 14_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Professional x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 700 Error 30/07/16 20:17:26 31/07/16 11:08:49 14.25 405.2 / 405.2
BETA_ E236441_ 221_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UHXUUTGPCSCBNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N.15_ s1_ 14_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise x64 Edition, (06.02.9200.00) 700 Error 26/07/16 20:17:24 31/07/16 10:22:35 18.00 205.0 / 0.0
BETA_ E236441_ 221_ S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UHXUUTGPCSCBNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N.15_ s1_ 14_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 700 Pending Verification 26/07/16 20:17:08 27/07/16 17:58:43 18.00 512.0 / 0.0

Interesting, though. Both _0 and _1 hit 18 hours in Job #0, but _0 is PVer and _1 is Error confused. Both _2 and _3 (mine) errored in Job #0 with exit code 195 (0xc3).
[Aug 1, 2016 9:14:00 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: CEP2 beta test July 25, 2016 [Issues Thread]
Final (bad) outcome for BETA_E236441_221_S.400.C56F1H25N2S1.UHXUUTGPCSCBNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N.15_s1_14 detailed in previous post:

_4 also hit 18 hours in Job #0 and resulted in Error.
_0 turned from PVer to Too Late (the "need later review by techs" usage).
[Aug 2, 2016 7:10:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 45   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread