Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 14
Posts: 14   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4206 times and has 13 replies Next Thread
supdood
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 6, 2015
Post Count: 333
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New flavors of OET WUs?

Getting a lot of segmentation violation errors from these new WUs on android:


Result Name: OET1_ 0001980_ x3MX2p_ 0065_ 0--

I don't know if there's a relation between Android and these new WUs. I still have some old WUs lying around:

Example 1:
Name: OET1_0001909_xZAGP-S_rig_92019
_0 No Reply
_1 Error - process got signal 11
_2 Error - SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
_3 Valid
_4 Valid

Example 2:
Name: OET1_0001926_xZAGP-S_rig_99578
_0 Error - SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
_1 Error - process got signal 11
_2 Valid
_3 Valid


Up to 7 of these errors today and 20 CPU hours wasted.
----------------------------------------
Crunch with BOINC team USA
www.boincusa.com

[Mar 31, 2016 12:35:41 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
supdood
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 6, 2015
Post Count: 333
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New flavors of OET WUs?

Is anyone else getting these errors? I'm piling them up, all on WUs that have been suspended at some point during the process.

Update: Those WUs that were an error on my android and then went to a PC were valid from the PC. Those that went to other androids are resulting in multiple errors, with no valids yet to show.
----------------------------------------
Crunch with BOINC team USA
www.boincusa.com

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by supdood at Mar 31, 2016 2:43:12 PM]
[Mar 31, 2016 1:27:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New flavors of OET WUs?

Glad to see the new flavor go [tomorrow last I hope], as these caused on my tablet kind of serial signal 11 failures [maybe 20% succeeded], whereas the single job flex [to return as of batch 3666], had a better than 90% success rate. Think I'm not the only one reporting this.
[Apr 15, 2016 5:16:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
asdavid
Veteran Cruncher
FRANCE
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 521
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New flavors of OET WUs?

I was able with the old WUs to predict approximately the duration according the name (FW were the shortest, FA the longest ones)
is that the same with the new ones?
----------------------------------------
Anne-Sophie

[May 1, 2016 2:20:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 14   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread