Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 41
|
![]() |
Author |
|
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher US Joined: Apr 16, 2008 Post Count: 443 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Got three. Behavior so far looks like the run time was initially overestimated. I've done a restart that may affect two of them. Now two workunits in progress. One at 1d 17:50:46 elapsed, 78.221% progress, 11:39:54 estimated remaining. Other at 1d 17:17:07 elapsed, 62.690% progress, 1d 00:33:51 estimated remaining. If this is normal, these workunits need more frequent updating of the progress to help users tell whether the workunits have gone into an endless loop with the progress stopped. It now appears that one of the two workunits I previously restarted completed normally, and is waiting for verification. The other, and the one still waiting to run when I did the restart, are either in endless loops, or have the last parts of their runs severely UNDERestimated in run time. |
||
|
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher US Joined: Apr 16, 2008 Post Count: 443 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Got three. Behavior so far looks like the run time was initially overestimated. I've done a restart that may affect two of them. Now two workunits in progress. One at 1d 17:50:46 elapsed, 78.221% progress, 11:39:54 estimated remaining. Other at 1d 17:17:07 elapsed, 62.690% progress, 1d 00:33:51 estimated remaining. If this is normal, these workunits need more frequent updating of the progress to help users tell whether the workunits have gone into an endless loop with the progress stopped. It now appears that one of the two workunits I previously restarted completed normally, and is waiting for verification. The other, and the one still waiting to run when I did the restart, are either in endless loops, or have the last parts of their runs severely UNDERestimated in run time. Apparently both in endless loops - no more progress in about 14 additional hours, so I aborted them. |
||
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Unless techs enter a new Beta startup average fpops for a test, it will use the last known value from the result feedback.
Add beta22 to the project app_config.xml with the <fraction_done_exact/> parm and you get rather exact TTC projections from the first '% to time computed' update shown... I did on the original beta22 test. |
||
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
those 6 BETAs have a long time to finish...21st Mar as a END date...how so?!
----------------------------------------my machines have been doing other jobs instead with closer dates! ![]() |
||
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
here are the results, still 1 pending:
----------------------------------------BETA_ AC0002_ T000_ F00099_ S00001n_ 1-- T60 Pending Validation 3/10/16 23:24:53 3/15/16 04:23:41 2.77 / 4.21 78.1 / 0.0 BETA_ AC0002_ T000_ F00077_ S00001l_ 0-- DG33FB Valid 3/10/16 23:22:40 3/14/16 22:17:29 1.95 / 1.97 46.7 / 49.5 BETA_ AC0002_ T000_ F00078_ S00001c_ 0-- DG33FB Valid 3/10/16 23:22:40 3/14/16 22:17:29 1.97 / 1.98 46.9 / 53.7 BETA_ AC0002_ T000_ F00077_ S00001p_ 0-- DG33FB Valid 3/10/16 23:22:40 3/14/16 22:17:29 1.95 / 1.97 46.7 / 52.6 BETA_ AC0002_ T000_ F00075_ S00001f_ 0-- DG33FB Valid 3/10/16 23:22:40 3/14/16 22:17:29 1.96 / 1.97 46.7 / 46.5 BETA_ AC0002_ T000_ F00036_ S00001f_ 0-- VS4 Valid 3/10/16 22:58:46 3/15/16 23:26:28 2.44 / 2.68 55.4 / 62.3 also, what is that? a new project A.C.?! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
also, what is that? a new project A.C.?! More likely that the letters BETA will change into the project initials. |
||
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Since we know there will be a next test, those will have D.C. in the task name
![]() |
||
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Since we know there will be a next test, those will have D.C. in the task name ![]() no, they are HST now... ![]() |
||
|
Eric_Kaiser
Veteran Cruncher Germany (Hessen) Joined: May 7, 2013 Post Count: 1047 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
no, they are HST now... ![]() and AC ![]() |
||
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
For those Thunderstruck when not understanding that after AC comes DC. So happens the song calls for a doctor ;P
(Think the lead singer retired last week because he threatened to go stone deaf). /ot |
||
|
|
![]() |