Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 58
Posts: 58   Pages: 6   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 11866 times and has 57 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

From the project news update at https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/about_us/viewNewsArticle.do?articleId=369
As a side note, this benchmarking process is why members may have experienced shorter or longer than usual runtimes over the past several months. The core algorithm of the Mapping Cancer Markers engine, used to evaluate each potential gene signature, has a processing time that is highly dependent on the statistical characteristics of each signature. The search space targeted by a single work unit can sometimes contain time-consuming signatures, which together lead to a longer total runtime. This also means variability with the size of Mapping Cancer Markers results. A typical work unit will evaluate tens of thousands of potential gene signatures, many of which are of low quality. Signatures below a certain quality threshold are removed from the returned results. However, the search space targeted by a single work unit can sometimes contain a high proportion of high-quality gene signatures. If this happens, the result file is larger than usual.

[Jul 10, 2014 3:56:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
l_mckeon
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Post Count: 439
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

From here on in I'll only mention the really short batches, of which 5869 and 5870 are two (~15 minutes).
[Jul 14, 2014 12:14:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1326
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Batch 5877 is also running at about 15 minutes
----------------------------------------

[Jul 14, 2014 6:15:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

5899's are running about three times longer; these are the start of the longer WU's. For people with deep queues; you might want to either reduce queue depth or disable getting new WU's when you have quite a few already in your queue. This way the ETA can be adjusted to be more accurate. If someone is running a 4-day queue, they will get around 12-days worth and they won't complete them in time or return some past the resend deadline and ultimately cause three WU's to be returned which just wastes CPU time.
[Jul 14, 2014 3:47:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

When reading that yesterday, decided to bulk up my cache with 2.5 days worth and let it compute, whatever came. Set a new node record with 354 results validated and 65k points for 7:10 days cpu time. That's 8k points per hyperthread for 24 hours computing. Anyone around who can better that confused (Since we figured out how retarded the credit system is, there's smart points to hop on, stockpile, and when to hop off. The lol part is, cherry picking was supposed to have been rooted out with credit new, yes really. This is fun and doing good and the same time laughing )
[Jul 15, 2014 10:07:37 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher
The Great State of Texas
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 1054
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Not really better..
Just one of my stock 3770's

07/14/2014 0:007:23:34:27 72,067 335

coffee
cowboy
----------------------------------------

[Jul 15, 2014 2:00:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

I'm getting a mixture of short (sub 30 mins) and longer (up to 8 hrs). Just swings and roundabouts. Don't run 24 hours like some so it isn't an issue with me.
[Jul 15, 2014 3:44:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Not really better..
Just one of my stock 3770's

07/14/2014 0:007:23:34:27 72,067 335

coffee
cowboy

Pitting your 3770 at 3.4/3.7ghz against my mobile 2670 at 2.0-2.2? Such daredevils, those great state texans. tongue
[Jul 15, 2014 3:54:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher
The Great State of Texas
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 1054
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Pitting your 3770 at 3.4/3.7ghz against my mobile 2670 at 2.0-2.2? Such daredevils, those great state texans. tongue


laughing Lol I said it wasn't better. tongue
That was my best one too.. d oh

So Grats on yours.. applause applause

coffee
cowboy
----------------------------------------

[Jul 15, 2014 4:04:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

07/14/2014 0:022:10:18:03 280,023 1,558
07/14/2014 0:015:12:37:35 211,486 1,119
07/14/2014 0:016:03:08:15 200,832 1,083

This one does some CEP2's as well:
07/14/2014 0:020:06:44:36 202,667 968
[Jul 15, 2014 4:14:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 58   Pages: 6   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread