Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 17
Posts: 17   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3585 times and has 16 replies Next Thread
noderaser
Senior Cruncher
United States
Joined: Jun 6, 2006
Post Count: 297
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

I would have a look in your event log for clues as to why you're not getting as much work as you'd like.
----------------------------------------
[Apr 9, 2014 10:58:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

There is a limit of work in progress at 25 units per core.

Don't know if I've seen it posted anywhere, but it definitely limits my downloads.


Wow! What a great memory! currently the system does have a max limit per core. This is set on the server side. I will need to debate raising this, but since I don't remember why it was set to 25 in the first place or how long ago it was set, I will need to think of worst case scenarios so that history does not repeat itself.


fyi, the server setting in the config is this:
<max_wus_in_progress>25</max_wus_in_progress>

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Apr 16, 2014 4:40:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

Seems to me this was set towards the end of HCMD2 because of the totally random lengths and run-times. Many systems were overcommitting with very small cache sizes.

As for the limit, I only rarely hit it and that is when running only FAAH Vina.

Doesn't seem to be to burdensome.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Apr 16, 2014 11:32:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Byteball_730a2960
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 29, 2010
Post Count: 318
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

KWSN - Thanks a lot for that. You are spot on. 8 thread machine and I had 200 tasks.

A quick back of the envelope calculation based on work done over the weekend (96% FAAH, 4% MCM) shows that I had roughly a 92 hour buffer.

Due to my schedule, I have quite a few 3 day weekends during which the computer is left to crunch until I come back and connect it to the internet again. This is usually an 88-92 hours absence which cuts it really really fine.

I have a 4 perhaps 5 day weekend coming up meaning a max 136 hour window.
Going from what you guys have said, there is no way that I can extend this 88-92 hour buffer is there?

Unless I switch to MCM for that weekend?
[Apr 21, 2014 12:00:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

Right.

Unless you want to load a bunch of tasks and abort all the VINA till you have enough Autodock which should carry you through.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Apr 21, 2014 2:03:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Byteball_730a2960
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 29, 2010
Post Count: 318
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

Yup. That is what I was thinking I will have to do.

Probably easier to switch to MCM for that particular weekend then.

Thanks again.
[Apr 21, 2014 3:50:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Does your minimum work buffer fill to your settings?

There's a conflict between how boinc is designed to work using the duration correction factor and wcg having disabled this function remotely for the version 7 agents. The dcf for these is locked to 1.000000 for the project, speak wcg overall. Some projects do this to prevent buffer overload because of higher variable runtimes from workunit to workunit and batch to batch. Devices that process faster than average rarely hit buffer setting and devices that are slower often have more work than wanted. Regrettably, this and adjusting the buffer to that behavior also affects the work request frequency, when using maximum additional work buffer and the order of processing, the earlier deadline first, if set over a certain factor relating to deadlines. All in all, loading multiple days and only connect once or twice a week is problametic in amongst. Everyone has to work out for themselves what's the best setting to suite their needs, far from optimal.
[Apr 21, 2014 9:41:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 17   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread