| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: Mapping Cancer Markers Forum
Thread: Validator Bug or somthing else? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hey.
Is there a validator bug on this project like C.E.P., these tasks are all from the same rig looking at the claimed credits for run times.  MCM1_ 0001766_ 4079_ 0-- 728 Pending Validation 1/29/14 00:29:46 2/1/14 01:49:25 28.13 128.6 / 0.0 MCM1_ 0001774_ 3055_ 1-- 728 Valid 1/29/14 08:01:47 2/1/14 01:49:25 10.33 263.6 / 245.6 MCM1_ 0001774_ 2919_ 1-- 728 Valid 1/29/14 08:01:47 2/1/14 01:49:25 7.16 182.7 / 201.2 |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7847 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Well, since the first one is pending validation, it is too early to judge that one, even though it is only possibly getting 4.57 points per hour. The next two are consistent with 25.518 and 25.517 points per hour respectively. My question would be: When the first one was crunching, were you using the computer for something else which may have been compute intensive ? The second thought is: How consistent has this machine been been overall, say, for the last 100 WU it has crunched? It is possible the first one is just an anomaly, for me the results have been quite uniform, varying about 10%, but keep us informed on what it finally gets.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi Sgt.Joe.
----------------------------------------All it dose is crunch, well for over 28hrs I would have expected it to claim a lot more then what it did. Looking at the others and yes it normally claims the right amount for the run times.  But not with this one, disappointed.  Hopefully the wingman will claim more than me.  Edit / My dreams have come true, this just in. MCM1_ 0001766_ 4079_ 1-- 728 Valid 1/29/14 00:30:20 2/1/14 01:52:29 37.92 579.4 / 354.0 MCM1_ 0001766_ 4079_ 0-- 728 Valid 1/29/14 00:29:46 2/1/14 01:49:25 28.13 128.6 / 354.0 ----- mine. -------------------------------------------- This ones from the same rig, it claimed a good amount for the time. MCM1_ 0001612_ 7155_ 2-- 728 Valid 1/29/14 08:01:47 1/31/14 00:35:44 23.61 547.8 / 499.6 ------ much better. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 1, 2014 4:21:00 AM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7847 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I rechecked my figures for one of my machines and found that the credit I got mostly stayed consistent, but when I looked closer there were some outliers. The average for the machine I checked was about 19.3 points per hour, but the lowest was 10.9 and the highest was 45.1. So my initial assessment was wrong. Hopefully the wingman will help you out on this one.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
|