Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2849 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
RicktheBrick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Sep 23, 2005
Post Count: 206
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
72 core intel knights landing

Here is an interesting article about Intel's 72 core chip http://www.realworldtech.com/knights-landing-details/. This microprocessor is way too much for the average user since it will do 3 teraflops. I would think that a 1,000 results a day would not be too much to expect from this chip. So 2,000 of these computers should be able to duplicate the results wcg now gets. Now compare that to the over 2 million computers that are supposedly working for wcg. Even if only 10% of them are that would mean 200,000 plus or still a lot more. The time is coming soon when we will not be needed anymore.
[Jan 5, 2014 8:06:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
hunter1978
Advanced Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 24, 2010
Post Count: 111
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 72 core intel knights landing

biggrin Start saving your loose change to buy that !
----------------------------------------

[Jan 5, 2014 8:45:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 72 core intel knights landing

According to boincstats, we have just over 300,000 active hosts, not the two millions you refer to.

Also, isn't this "CPU" the Xeon-Phi?
i think this isn't exactly suitable for all projects. It seems more like a GPU, only some tasks can run on it.
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jan 5, 2014 8:49:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
yoro42
Ace Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 19, 2011
Post Count: 8979
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 72 core intel knights landing

The time is coming soon when we will not be needed anymore.

I suspect that a diminishing marginal contribution will not make us obsolete, only lower our rankings. Hopefully, the new technologies will help formulate the correct question for "Deep Thought" to answer.
----------------------------------------

[Jan 5, 2014 9:29:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 72 core intel knights landing

Hello RicktheBrick,
Now compare that to the over 2 million computers that are supposedly working for wcg.
Looking in Statistics, I see that yesterdays run time was:
Total Run Time (y:d:h:m:s) 747:241:14:57:37

This comes to 747 years * 365 + 242 days which is 272,797 computer days. After doing a little math, we get a number that rounds up to less than 300 K computers or more than 1/4 M computers. Back in November 2013 it was less than 400 computer years a day! We are doing great, but it will be some time before we reach 2 million computer-equivalents.

devilish
Lawrence
[Jan 5, 2014 10:52:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread