Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm a little bored! I'm looking for a new challenge!
----------------------------------------Question - Can Boinc/WCG run and take advantage of a milti-node cluster? Would it benefit my work completed/output for the power (electricity) usage? I've been looking at requirements, it recommends a powerful server and all nodes 'should' be identical (or very close to). I have one mechine that is suitable for the server, along with 4 machines that are 'Identical' (or close to) same MB, processor, RAM (both speed and type) & HDD But will Boinc run in this environment? I would be greatful for your comments/thoughts
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
sunfolk
Master Cruncher Super Kiwi Socialistic Empire Of Jacinda Joined: Oct 8, 2006 Post Count: 1769 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Mamajuanauk,
----------------------------------------Yes BOINC absolutely will run like this (server & headless/diskless clients) it's already been done with this distro for example. The Ubuntu used is a little old now, but fine for crunching. Have alot of fun! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds like fun! Does it give improved performance/output?
----------------------------------------
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
sunfolk
Master Cruncher Super Kiwi Socialistic Empire Of Jacinda Joined: Oct 8, 2006 Post Count: 1769 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds like fun! Does it give improved performance/output? Probably not, I expect the nodes would run, just as fast as the nodes could run, and no faster.Why would they do anything else? However, I would expect to see a small saving in electricity costs.No hard drives etcetera. Look, here are my historical thoughts/ramblings about clusters/beowulfs and such like. In 2006 I started crunching. A dual core processor was a supercomputer. The idea of a multi-node cluster is very attractive in 2006/7/8. But, by the time 2013 comes around.We already have 8 cores in a box, running 16 threads!So why bother? BECAUSE IT'S FUN, and you learn stuff about networks/filesystems/the real guts of computing/ by doing practical cluster building. It's cool to see a diskless node boot over the network and start to crunch science. So give it a go. ![]() Edited: Cos I aint no speller nor gramma pefectionist! ![]() ![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by sunfolk at Oct 8, 2013 2:33:35 PM] |
||
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yep, and it will keep me out of trouble too, so I'll give it a go...
----------------------------------------Thanks
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |