Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 15
|
![]() |
Author |
|
twilyth
Master Cruncher US Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Post Count: 2130 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How one UK man turns annoying cold calls into cash I'm not sure what a 'premium number' is but I want one. Unfortunately it looks like we don't have them in the US.
----------------------------------------Lee Beaumont paid £10 (about $15) to set up a premium phone number — known as an 0871 line in Britain — so every time someone called, they had to pay roughly 20 cents, with his cut being ~11 cents. source![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
In the us it is the 900 or 976 numbers used by the $0.99/min folks, telemarketers don't call them ;)
There was a story about 10 years ago of a mom that set one up and put it on a "How's my driving" sign for her teenage son's car, got paid and kept track of son at the same time :D |
||
|
yoro42
Ace Cruncher United States Joined: Feb 19, 2011 Post Count: 8979 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Heard on NPR as to the difference between dog and cat lovers:
----------------------------------------"Dog people want there dogs to be human and cat people want to be cats." I can relate. ![]() |
||
|
twilyth
Master Cruncher US Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Post Count: 2130 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IBM will spend $1B to promote Linux . Apparently they also did this back in 2000 and Microsoft nearly had kittens.
----------------------------------------But the scare tactics didn't work and Linux adoption grew, in large part due to IBM's vote of confidence. There's hardly an enterprise data center on the planet today that isn't using Linux and it has become the operating system of choice for the world's biggest, fastest computers, as well as for huge Internet companies like Google and Facebook. But Linux has not killed Windows Server. Not even close. Servers running Linux now command 23% of new server purchases by enterprises, where servers running Microsoft Windows command 49%, according to IDC's latest quarterly server report. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IBM will spend $1B to promote Linux . Apparently they also did this back in 2000 and Microsoft nearly had kittens. But the scare tactics didn't work and Linux adoption grew, in large part due to IBM's vote of confidence. There's hardly an enterprise data center on the planet today that isn't using Linux and it has become the operating system of choice for the world's biggest, fastest computers, as well as for huge Internet companies like Google and Facebook. But Linux has not killed Windows Server. Not even close. Servers running Linux now command 23% of new server purchases by enterprises, where servers running Microsoft Windows command 49%, according to IDC's latest quarterly server report. Good story ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Like nearly all other mass shooters, ex-Navy shooter Aaron Alexis was also being treated with psychiatric drugs
----------------------------------------(NaturalNews) We weren't planning to cover this story until the Associated Press confirmed that Aaron Alexis, the shooter believed responsible for the recent mass shooting at the Navy yard, "had been treated since August by the Veterans Administration for his mental problems." This is proof that Aaron Alexis was on psychiatric drugs, because that's the only treatment currently being offered by the Veterans Administration for mental problems. Alexis' family members also confirmed to the press that he was being "treated" for his mental health problems. Across the medical industry, "treatment" is the code word for psychiatric drugging. http://www.naturalnews.com/042096_Aaron_Alexi...otings.html#ixzz2fBgZA6M9 ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Simple steps to check Microwave leakage:- Correct ?
----------------------------------------When was the last time you checked your microwave for radiation leakage? Yes, I did say radiation leakage, because any microwave can start leaking radiation any time, for whatever reasons. And such a leakage is hazardous to humans and pets in the house. You don't need to call in experts or to send your microwave to the dealer's workshop for a leakage test. That's time consuming, inconvenient and costly. Here's how you can test your microwave for radiation leakage, right in your own house, at no cost. Just follow these simple steps. 1. Switch-off and un-plug the microwave from the electrical socket. 2. Place your mobile phone inside the microwave and shut the door. 3. Using another mobile phone, dial the phone that's inside the microwave. 4. If the outside phone says "the number you are dialling is not reachable, or is out of coverage area, or is switched off; then your microwave is safe. 5. But if the phone inside the microwave lights up and rings, your microwave is leaking radiation. Just throw away the damn thing and get a new one. (Believe me, the medical treatment of the side-effects of radiation leaks is costlier than the price of maybe 10 new microwaves.) Remember, just because the door of your microwave appears to shut properly does not conclusively mean that it is not leaking radiation. Stay safe, and test your microwave regularly at frequent intervals; the frequency of testing depending on the extent of usage, and you are the best judge of that. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Lol, GeraldRube factoids, they hardly check:
Some web sites recommend using a cell phone to test a microwave oven for radiation leakage. You are supposed to put your cell phone in the oven and try to call it. If it rings, it is supposed to indicate a leak. However, this method is wrong because cell phones operate at different frequencies than microwave ovens. Even if the cell phone rings in the oven, this does not indicate a leak, so it is nothing to worry about. Protection against microwave leakage in microwave ovens is specifically tuned to the frequency of the microwaves (2.4 GHz) and is not expected to prevent other frequencies to get through (cell phone frequencies are in the 800 to 1900 MHz range). or You have either not read the information referenced, or you do not understand it. Your microwave oven housing (a Faraday cage) is designed to shield electromagnetic radiation (EMR) at a much lower frequency than a cell phone operates at. Muslin makes a poor bulletproof vest for a similar reason. Any given phone may or may not ring inside any given oven. This is not a function of the oven's construction. It is a function of signal strength between the antenna and transmission tower. Take an oven and phone pair that "pass" your bad science test. Reduce the distance by half of the pair from the closest antenna tower and the pair will "fail" your bad science test. Even simpler - if a particular cell phone does not ring on in the oven, test it in the refrigerator or gas oven. It will not ring in there either. To the extent that you have an honest concern regarding the health of a loved one, please seek competent professional medical advice. Whether this and the previous post fits what twilyth had in mind starting this thread... his to say, if he can be bothered. Skipping forward. |
||
|
twilyth
Master Cruncher US Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Post Count: 2130 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Sekerob. I wasn't going to say anything since I didn't want to play junior moderator but the second one about microwaves definitely doesn't - although I'm sure with the help of Google a supporting news story could be found on microwave safety. How interesting or funny that would be though is subject to debate.
----------------------------------------As to the first one about the DC shooting and psychiatric drugs, I'd prefer that this thread not be used for controversial issues. That wasn't the intent. They may be interesting but the idea here was to collect stories that people would enjoy reading. Things that would stimulate their curiosity or tickle their funny bones. There's certainly a place for things that stimulate discussion and even argument too, but this was never intended to be that. ![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by twilyth at Sep 18, 2013 3:26:09 PM] |
||
|
twilyth
Master Cruncher US Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Post Count: 2130 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can google cure death?
----------------------------------------Google is launching a new company with the absurdly ambitious objective of extending our lives. The company is called "Calico," . . . . . . So, how is Calico going to go about extending our lives, and perhaps, ultimately curing death? Page doesn't lay out any specific plan. On Google+ he says, "it’s still very early days so there’s not much more to share yet. Of course when Art has something more substantial to communicate (and that will likely take time), he’ll provide an update." Time reports, "While the company is holding its cards about Calico close to the vest, expect it to use its core data-handling skills to shed new light on familiar age-related maladies. Sources close to the project suggest it will start small and focus entirely on researching new technologies." It's fine Calico doesn't have an exact plan. It's tackling a huge challenge. If there were some straight line, simple solution, this would have been cured long ago. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |