Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 14623
Posts: 14623   Pages: 1463   [ Previous Page | 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2750732 times and has 14622 replies Next Thread
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

Milestone! biggrin

Points Generated (Rank) : 140,013,236 (#877)

And 120 years due in the next few days biggrin

A question on points per hour...

My understanding is that points per hour is based on your computer's crunching performance... so it's only reasonable to compare points/hour by project if the points are obtained on exactly the same hardware... so historically looking at points per hour for long-finished projects is pointless because most people will have upgraded their computers by now?

Is that correct?
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
[Feb 8, 2016 4:03:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
RTS48
Veteran Cruncher
Bolivia
Joined: Aug 2, 2009
Post Count: 1353
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

A question on points per hour...

My understanding is that points per hour is based on your computer's crunching performance... so it's only reasonable to compare points/hour by project if the points are obtained on exactly the same hardware... so historically looking at points per hour for long-finished projects is pointless because most people will have upgraded their computers by now?

Is that correct?

I guess it is dc but in my case I am using mostly the same computers that I used in 2009 (makes you want to weep doesn't it). I started out with a 27" iMac in Sept 2010 and then added a 17" Mac Book Pro in Nov 2010 and finally added a 15" Mac Book Pro in February 2014. Over the period of using Macs I have amassed approx 69.5 y of CPU time. All other results were on slow dual core PCs alas now not used (perhaps I should revive them)

The figures that I posted are direct calculations from my 'Contribution' page and are probably quite specific to my computers. It is probably more relevant to look at the differential figures that I produced for OET and FAH2 (as well as the Beta WUs) as they are current. I would be interested to see other crunchers figures. All that is needed is to copy and paste the figures into Excel and then parse the run time data (Text to numbers using : as the delimiter. I then calculate 'seconds' run time (I have assumed a 365 day year so there is no compensation for leap years). and divide this into the points and multiply by 3600 to generate points / hour. Have a go yourselves - it's really simple.
----------------------------------------
Rod Peel
Santa Cruz
Bolivia
South America

,
,
[Feb 8, 2016 4:28:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

Just noticed... I'm one place away from getting in the top 5000 for points. Fame at last!
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
[Feb 8, 2016 4:32:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

A question on points per hour...

My understanding is that points per hour is based on your computer's crunching performance... so it's only reasonable to compare points/hour by project if the points are obtained on exactly the same hardware... so historically looking at points per hour for long-finished projects is pointless because most people will have upgraded their computers by now?

Is that correct?

I guess it is dc but in my case I am using mostly the same computers that I used in 2009 (makes you want to weep doesn't it). I started out with a 27" iMac in Sept 2010 and then added a 17" Mac Book Pro in Nov 2010 and finally added a 15" Mac Book Pro in February 2014. Over the period of using Macs I have amassed approx 69.5 y of CPU time. All other results were on slow dual core PCs alas now not used (perhaps I should revive them).

I think it was Thargor who requested displaying points/hour on my stats pages. However, even if I just did this for the current projects, it's still not going to be all that accurate, because it could be the case that those with less capable hardware might avoid running CEP2 because of its demands, which would skew the averages?
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by dcrobinson at Feb 8, 2016 6:20:50 PM]
[Feb 8, 2016 4:54:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
crooks_uk
Veteran Cruncher
England
Joined: Nov 25, 2004
Post Count: 1013
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

Milestone! biggrin

Points Generated (Rank) : 140,013,236 (#877)


An excellent milestone to achieve. Congratulations
----------------------------------------
[Feb 8, 2016 11:16:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
crooks_uk
Veteran Cruncher
England
Joined: Nov 25, 2004
Post Count: 1013
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

Just noticed... I'm one place away from getting in the top 5000 for points. Fame at last!


Congratulations Dave! A well deserved achievement
----------------------------------------
[Feb 8, 2016 11:19:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

Good morning all
[Feb 9, 2016 4:48:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Good morning team.

Good morning everyone. smile

Just to confirm I love malt whiskey and always drink it neat. Whatever other people is up to them, their choice and no business of mine to say anything else. biggrin
[Feb 9, 2016 8:01:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Thargor
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Feb 3, 2012
Post Count: 1291
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

For those running OET, have you noticed the run-time for the work-units (batch #0001773) is a lot longer than the previous batch? Mine are running just over an hour per work-unit, with this batch.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 9, 2016 9:49:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Good morning team.

For those running OET, have you noticed the run-time for the work-units (batch #0001773) is a lot longer than the previous batch? Mine are running just over an hour per work-unit, with this batch.

Yes, I agree. Shorter than they have been historically, but much longer than the batch last week.
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
[Feb 9, 2016 9:59:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 14623   Pages: 1463   [ Previous Page | 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread