| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 10
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Name HFCC_target-9_01932244_target-9_0000_0
Application Help Fight Childhood Cancer 6.40 Workunit name HFCC_target-9_01932244_target-9_0000 State Running Received 08-08-2012 23:06 Report deadline 18-08-2012 23:06 Estimated app speed 1.78 GFLOPs/sec Estimated task size 50'843 GFLOPs CPU time at last checkpoint 01d,02:26:05 CPU time 01d,02:29:14 Elapsed time 01d,05:39:32 Estimated time remaining 01d,03:53:18 Fraction done 47.675% Virtual memory size 224.77 MB Working set size 52.20 MB Directory slots/0 Process ID 1980 Not A problem, just want to let you know there may be more out there, wingman took 35.78 hrs and is PV waiting on my copy, should be in sometime Tuesday AM Other HFCC wu running fine in the 8-12 hr range, I thought wingman was just a slow box until I ran for a bit, looks like I am the slow one (somewhat normal) ![]() |
||
|
|
rilian
Veteran Cruncher Ukraine - we rule! Joined: Jun 17, 2007 Post Count: 1460 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
this happens sometimes ;)
----------------------------------------on a 2GHz core you can often get 20-30h WUs ---------------------------------------- [Edit 2 times, last edit by rilian at Aug 13, 2012 6:32:13 AM] |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
These HFCC units vary widely in size. I have had from 2 hours to over 48 hours on various machines. The bigger units seem to come in waves. They do wreak havoc on the DCF which throws the cache settings off for a short while.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
I wonder what setups people are running for these long wu. On a 1.7 ghz AMD opteron core, I have not seen any HFCC WU over 17 hours, and would consider that a slow cpu. Maybe I have not gotten one of these "monster WU" :)
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The longest 48 hour units occurred on a 2.4gz Xeon (Linux Mint 7) on a HP DL360 G3(?) circa 2004 and some 40 hour plus units on a 1.6gz P4. Fairly old stuff. I have found that the Linux on the P4 runs about twice the the speed of Win XP on an identical P4.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
----------------------------------------*Minnesota Crunchers* [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sgt.Joe at Aug 14, 2012 3:09:55 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well it finished, blew out my DCF from 3 days to 23 :D That will fix in a few hrs. not able to report atm, but will check back later
----------------------------------------edit: Final CPU Time: 54 hrs, 53 min, 36 sec [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 14, 2012 11:29:45 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
HFCC_ target-9_ 01932244_ target-9_ 0000_ 1-- 640 Valid 8/9/12 04:06:55 8/11/12 13:32:24 35.78 592.3 / 117.7
HFCC_ target-9_ 01932244_ target-9_ 0000_ 0-- 640 Valid 8/9/12 04:06:02 8/14/12 11:48:31 54.89 117.7 / 117.7 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
HFCC_ target-9_ 01932244_ target-9_ 0000_ 1-- 640 Valid 8/9/12 04:06:55 8/11/12 13:32:24 35.78 592.3 / 117.7 HFCC_ target-9_ 01932244_ target-9_ 0000_ 0-- 640 Valid 8/9/12 04:06:02 8/14/12 11:48:31 54.89 117.7 / 117.7 Poor wingman... |
||
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
I did get one of these wu now...ran 29 hours on a 1.7 ghz opteron core. It got rewarded with points nicely as it had a replication of 1.
----------------------------------------HFCC_ target-9_ 02062335_ target-9_ 0000_ 0-- 640 Valid 8/13/12 23:13:32 8/15/12 06:29:48 29.19 309.1 / 373.8 ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
HFCC_ target-9_ 01932244_ target-9_ 0000_ 1-- 640 Valid 8/9/12 04:06:55 8/11/12 13:32:24 35.78 592.3 / 117.7 HFCC_ target-9_ 01932244_ target-9_ 0000_ 0-- 640 Valid 8/9/12 04:06:02 8/14/12 11:48:31 54.89 117.7 / 117.7 Poor wingman... HFCC_ target-9_ 01944840_ target-9_ 0001_ 0-- Valid 8/9/12 11:06:20 8/14/12 12:57:49 10.29 160.0 / 148.6 Agree, one from the same box an hr later :( |
||
|
|
|