Probably until there's basically nothing of any higher priority than to bring in this functionality.

I'm sure that if the techs wanted to publicly state all that's on their "wish list", we'd all be amazed at the length of it. Basically, it's all a question of resources - there's only a handful of techs attempting to keep this whole grid up and running.

Yes, IBM may be a massive company (well, not as big as it once was - I can vouch for that, as I, along with many others have been "released" over the last few years), but as with all companies, everything has a price/budget, and therefore, priorities have to be set and kept to.

If you feel so strongly about this, why are you still here? Yes, of course we'd miss the power your machines bring to the grid, but if you feel as though this issue is the "number 1 priority" and it isn't being met, then why stick around?.

Déjà vu?

Let me state upfront that I have great respect and admiration for the paid staff and appreciate their efforts. That having been said, I would also like the ability to merge devices. every time I have to reload he OS, for whatever reason, even if I name the computer the same exact name, it starts anew as a new host. I agree it is not a big deal, just a nice to have.

Juat vainty I know, but I've got one 3 year old I7 950 rig that would rate very high in the "host" charts is all it's entinys could be merged.

But, please don't slow down the work on getting GPUs going.


B2I

B2I

i think we first should merge the topics about merging