| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2
Thread: Old validated WUs |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 6
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Brown Pelican
Cruncher Joined: Sep 9, 2010 Post Count: 8 Status: Offline |
qe547_ 00028_ 14-- michael-desktop Valid 29/05/12 21:15:19 31/05/12 23:23:04 8.12 153.6Â /Â 157.5
qe542_ 00092_ 3-- michael-desktop Valid 29/05/12 18:46:13 31/05/12 17:50:40 6.36 122.9Â /Â 129.0 qe428_ 00048_ 15-- michael-desktop Valid 25/05/12 03:24:12 27/05/12 04:37:11 11.27 228.8Â /Â 192.4 qe424_ 00108_ 9-- michael-desktop Valid 24/05/12 23:03:53 26/05/12 23:29:46 6.90 135.5Â /Â 133.0 qd682_ 00144_ 16-- michael-desktop Valid 24/04/12 13:01:19 27/04/12 05:36:41 10.08 192.4Â /Â 196.2 qd526_ 00030_ 12-- michael-desktop Valid 18/04/12 11:49:43 21/04/12 17:00:02 14.57 293.1Â /Â 257.0 qd521_ 00106_ 4-- michael-desktop Valid 18/04/12 07:34:52 21/04/12 04:52:56 12.27 238.0Â /Â 237.6 qd477_ 00003_ 7-- michael-desktop Valid 16/04/12 14:34:49 19/04/12 03:30:58 10.23 198.4Â /Â 195.2 qd471_ 00011_ 4-- michael-desktop Valid 16/04/12 09:37:25 18/04/12 19:28:27 12.10 239.6Â /Â 223.9 qc345_ 00007_ 8-- michael-desktop Valid 03/03/12 15:19:21 05/03/12 22:48:04 12.57 257.7Â /Â 193.2 qc343_ 00038_ 13-- michael-desktop Valid 03/03/12 14:25:35 05/03/12 22:48:04 13.11 268.9Â /Â 183.6 Why are these valid WUs still showing? amd fx6100 debian6.0.5.2 since Juy 9.2012 previously amd 4800 debian 6... (when the above were returned) Privacy | Sitemap | |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello Brown Pelican,
There are multiple short threads on this. Nobody knows why the last page of Results Status often contains Valid results that are several months old. Mine does. I suppose the staff are working on more important bugs. Another known problem is that some Valid results disappear in less than a day. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
For a substantial part either a result in the task distribution has not come back [click on WU detail for quorum] or it's part of a batch that has a MIA, maybe a few frozen results taken out of circulation [the 5 or 7 copies returned errors lock].
By and large, think we're settled on 24 hours or so for valids to stay. The exception on these appear to be the stragglers... if they come in really late and they are completing a batch that can be migrated to the master database, then they'll go real fast, even within 12 hours. Surely the techs could give a more general indication for the 'concerned'. FTM, I've got 45 pages of results that were processed [not "in progress"]. It was 58 for just the last run of DDDT2 [now 31], so surely they're working to clear off complete sets. There's greater interest on that for the sciences that have high result production and take more than a little storage. 10 days of FAAH or HPF2 is 700,000-800,000 results where a DDDT run even if stretched out over a month requires 250,000... the more ''live'' results the scheduler has to administer, the more performance is impacted [not telling anything new for many... just in case more readers show interest] |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
When different workunits are share input files, then they are deleted in a different way than normal workunits. All the workunits that share the common input are left in the database until all workunits that share the input files have completed successfully. Sometimes there will be a few workunits in that group that error out and we need to discuss with the researchers what to do with them. In those cases, the workunits will not be cleared from the database until we have agreement with the researchers about what to do. This can cause some workunits to stay in the database for a very long time.
|
||
|
|
Brown Pelican
Cruncher Joined: Sep 9, 2010 Post Count: 8 Status: Offline |
Thanks to knreed, lawrencehardin and SekeRob.
Supposes that Techs are busy busy. |
||
|
|
terianne929
Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 3, 2011 Post Count: 23 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
It is weird seeing a work unit from APRIL that doesn't show up on a one-page list (I only have one computer crunching), but when the list grows to two-pages (yay) there it is. The one in question for me:
Project Name: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2 Created: 04/16/2012 15:04:02 Name: qd521_00023 Minimum Quorum: 15 Replication: 19 My WU was #7 (...-06) and validated: qd521_ 00023_ 6-- 640 Valid 4/18/12 06:56:07 4/20/12 09:50:13 10.62 197.9 / 230.3 Just weird seeing it again on July 23rd.... TC |
||
|
|
|