Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum Thread: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 15
|
Author |
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Target06 has successfully passed its recent beta test. Work units for this new target are currently being built and should begin to be sent out within the next two weeks.
Seippel |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thank you Seippel. Does that mean that Target05 is near complete? Or will we receive both targets in parallel?
|
||
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Thank you Seippel. Does that mean that Target05 is near complete? Or will we receive both targets in parallel? Target05 is nearly complete and target06 work units will be sent out when target05 work units are depleted. They will not run in parallel although you may still see resends for target05. Seippel |
||
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
Just noticed my first target06 result: c4cw_ target06_ 000009295_ 0--
----------------------------------------Expect it won't be long till the 05 are all done. Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
I figure at the very LEAST it will be 10 days til the target 05s are done, and that's only assuming that everyone that has them completes them in the first 10 days. From my end here, I've gotten a LOT of _1s and _2s for target 05, and even a few 03s here and there, meaning it could take up to 18 days yet for some of them to be returned.
----------------------------------------Personally (and I know it's mainly just wishful thinking on my part) I wish some people (those that have slower machines, mainly, or HUGE caches of work units, or BOTH) would put their cache at 0.5 days or smaller, then so many people wouldn't have to wait 2 weeks for the units to get validated. i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Agreed. I've got WAY to many PV's
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Buggs, > 90% of the work is returned in under 4 days. Whilst we can wish for this and that preference by all other members so you can have your instant validation credits, there is an endless diversity of crunchers that will be running in default setting and don't have their machine on but for an hour / few hours to browse the web, do mail and run on power saving preset profile (host goes to sleep without user input). It's just part of facilitating the widest possible participation and luck of draw. My oldest PV is April 29 ATM. Yesterday it was one of the 22nd (thanks to running WCGDAWS the daily snapshot recorded that). In worst case scenario it's 14 days for a no-problem task... we'll survive :O)
As for batch, target , experiment completion, I let that be the techs worry. We crunch far faster than the scientists can interpret the complete data set, and well before target05 finish, target 6 setup was defined for seamless continuation. No throttling required in this round. :O) --//-- |
||
|
marvey11
Advanced Cruncher Germany Joined: Apr 2, 2011 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
The runtime estimates for T06 tasks so far seem to be the same as for the T05 ones, although they actually run about 30-40% longer. Just an observation -- I'm not grumbling or anything
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
... That is because the servers put the estimate in the header of what the returned result averages are of the previous days. Until T5 is in majority flushed, you'll see a curve rather than a step change.
--//-- |
||
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1261 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: |
Are we working on different things with target 06 causing run times to be longer? I'm wandering that's all c4cw_ target06_ 001489562_ 0-- took 2.75 hours on a I7 980X Target 05 were around 2.08-2.09 hours
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Speedy51 at May 6, 2012 10:21:40 AM] |
||
|
|