Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 15
Posts: 15   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3337 times and has 14 replies Next Thread
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Post Count: 392
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Target06 has successfully passed its recent beta test. Work units for this new target are currently being built and should begin to be sent out within the next two weeks.

Seippel
[May 2, 2012 7:58:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Thank you Seippel. Does that mean that Target05 is near complete? Or will we receive both targets in parallel?
[May 2, 2012 8:14:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Post Count: 392
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Thank you Seippel. Does that mean that Target05 is near complete? Or will we receive both targets in parallel?



Target05 is nearly complete and target06 work units will be sent out when target05 work units are depleted. They will not run in parallel although you may still see resends for target05.

Seippel
[May 3, 2012 2:38:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Just noticed my first target06 result: c4cw_ target06_ 000009295_ 0--

Expect it won't be long till the 05 are all done.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[May 5, 2012 6:20:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bugg
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 19, 2006
Post Count: 271
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

I figure at the very LEAST it will be 10 days til the target 05s are done, and that's only assuming that everyone that has them completes them in the first 10 days. From my end here, I've gotten a LOT of _1s and _2s for target 05, and even a few 03s here and there, meaning it could take up to 18 days yet for some of them to be returned.

Personally (and I know it's mainly just wishful thinking on my part) I wish some people (those that have slower machines, mainly, or HUGE caches of work units, or BOTH) would put their cache at 0.5 days or smaller, then so many people wouldn't have to wait 2 weeks for the units to get validated.
----------------------------------------

i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home

[May 6, 2012 4:42:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Agreed. I've got WAY to many PV's
[May 6, 2012 5:48:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Buggs, > 90% of the work is returned in under 4 days. Whilst we can wish for this and that preference by all other members so you can have your instant validation credits, there is an endless diversity of crunchers that will be running in default setting and don't have their machine on but for an hour / few hours to browse the web, do mail and run on power saving preset profile (host goes to sleep without user input). It's just part of facilitating the widest possible participation and luck of draw. My oldest PV is April 29 ATM. Yesterday it was one of the 22nd (thanks to running WCGDAWS the daily snapshot recorded that). In worst case scenario it's 14 days for a no-problem task... we'll survive :O)

As for batch, target , experiment completion, I let that be the techs worry. We crunch far faster than the scientists can interpret the complete data set, and well before target05 finish, target 6 setup was defined for seamless continuation. No throttling required in this round. :O)

--//--
[May 6, 2012 6:57:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
marvey11
Advanced Cruncher
Germany
Joined: Apr 2, 2011
Post Count: 89
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

The runtime estimates for T06 tasks so far seem to be the same as for the T05 ones, although they actually run about 30-40% longer. Just an observation -- I'm not grumbling or anything wink
----------------------------------------

[May 6, 2012 8:23:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

... That is because the servers put the estimate in the header of what the returned result averages are of the previous days. Until T5 is in majority flushed, you'll see a curve rather than a step change.

--//--
[May 6, 2012 8:59:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1261
Status: Recently Active
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Target06 for Computing for Clean Water

Are we working on different things with target 06 causing run times to be longer? I'm wandering that's all c4cw_ target06_ 001489562_ 0-- took 2.75 hours on a I7 980X Target 05 were around 2.08-2.09 hours
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Speedy51 at May 6, 2012 10:21:40 AM]
[May 6, 2012 10:14:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 15   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread