Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 32
Posts: 32   Pages: 4   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3401 times and has 31 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

There's trusted meaning you don't return errors, and reliable meaning you return WUs quickly. So if you have a 10 day cache, without frequent errors.you don't need to be validated by someone else, but you won't be reliable since you have a large cache. Reliable computers need to be accurate AND return results quickly. This way, when a host doesn't respond, errors out, your rig can be called on to quickly return results.
[Apr 29, 2012 12:43:07 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher
Norway
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 974
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

Fine. I thought that being "trusted" meant that a work unit did not need to be verified by someone else. I guess that is a different thing.

Yes, "trusted" does mean this, for the projects that support it. (some of WCG's projects always demands at least 2 computers regardless of "trusted" or not).

But, "isn't verified by someone else" does NOT mean "short deadline".
----------------------------------------


"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
[Apr 29, 2012 1:43:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

But, "isn't verified by someone else" does NOT mean "short deadline".
I am beginning to get the picture. I think the fact that I get an occasional short deadline (at least one a day; usually several) means that I am trusted, but that does not imply that they will all be short deadlines.

(IIRC there was an earlier statement by SekeRob, that the only way to determine whether a computer is "trusted" is whether it gets short return time limits. If that is wrong, let me know.)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Jim1348 at Apr 29, 2012 2:47:21 AM]
[Apr 29, 2012 1:47:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?



(IIRC there was an earlier statement by SekeRob, that the only way to determine whether a computer is "trusted" is whether it gets short return time limits. If that is wrong, let me know.)



I don't have the exact quote, but he was talking about Short return times for wu, these are repair, no reply, or error retry. they are only issued as needed, and then only to reliable hosts.

Some projects are single validation wu, ie FAAH, CEP2, etc but until your host is trusted will need a 2nd to validate

All normal wu have 10 day deadline, except HCC which has 7 days, short return deadline is 40% of original deadline

HTH
[Apr 29, 2012 3:39:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

Whilst the word "Trusted" was used [to follow the OP term], there is no such definition in BOINC world that I can find [but maybe in the developer documentation]. Only "Reliable" is used in context of work assignment and my use of the "Trust" word was a substitution and misdirecting. Best stick to the official descriptions, for risk of confusing some ;>)

The FAQ's will be updated in time where it involves the Zero Redundant distribution and reliability in general. Don't think I'll introduce the *trust* word in the ZR FAQ, where doing it alone does not mean the random checking is done away with. I'm still seeing the ~10% of old second opinion and giving second opinion with _1 suffixed tasks, with the normal 10 day deadline as applying to the ZR sciences [Not a sure fire indicator!]. These ZR are:

FAAH
HFCC
CEP2
C4CW
CFSW

My "Inconclusive" [after nearly 600 CFSW] are sporadic [and acting as verifying _1 wingman may double in the re-verification process for efficiency purposes, as they go valid... the 5 sequential valid rule]. Note that the *regular* distributions are shown on the Dashboard [since a few months at bottom of the Tasks Completed section], The Matrix [behind in updating for newest sciences] and in the Start Here FAQ's.

--//--

P.S. The official BOINC wiki, and our own WCGwikea refer to *trust* in terms of security:
* Do you trust the project to ensure that its applications won't damage your computer or
* Do you trust the project to use proper security practices on their servers?
3 KB (410 words) - 14:14, 2 June 2010


edit: added Dashboard link.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 29, 2012 7:43:21 AM]
[Apr 29, 2012 7:07:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

Whilst the word "Trusted" was used [to follow the OP term], there is no such definition in BOINC world that I can find [but maybe in the developer documentation]. Only "Reliable" is used in context of work assignment and my use of the "Trust" word was a substitution and misdirecting. Best stick to the official descriptions, for risk of confusing some ;>)
Thanks. I was not sure I remembered that right.

WCG does use the term "trusted" in the Help section though; maybe it should be more completely defined there?
Single Validation – Type 1: In this type of validation, only one copy of a workunit will be sent to a computer if the computer has been participating long enough and returning good results so that the computer is trusted. If the computer is not trusted, then they will still be assigned the workunit, but a second copy will be sent to another computer and the rules for redundant computation above apply. As a precaution, the research code computes certain items that allow us to quickly check on the server if the computation is likely to have finished correctly. Additionally, trusted computers are randomly sampled to have their results double checked. These techniques provide a very high level of confidence in the reliability of the results. FightAIDS@Home and Discovering Dengue Drugs – Together are examples of projects which use this technique.
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/help/viewSearch.do?searchString=trusted
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Jim1348 at Apr 29, 2012 9:17:56 AM]
[Apr 29, 2012 9:08:38 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

Hello Jim1348,
My opinions on fine distinctions are not to be trusted, since I pay little attention to them, but my opinion is that when WCG adopted the single-validation method, criteria had to be defined to select computers that could be allowed to run work without another computer as a check. The criteria for 'reliable' computers were adopted, save for the unnecessary quick return criterion, and the resulting computers were called 'trusted'. So all 'reliable' computers are 'trusted' but some 'trusted' computers have larger caches than 'reliable' computers do.

devilish Or maybe the rules have changed over the years without my noticing.

Lawrence
[Apr 29, 2012 9:49:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

I do remember someone asking how it could be determined whether your computer was trusted or not, and someone answered that the only way was to see if you got short deadlines (3 or 4 days). Maybe it was on another forum, but the question still remains. If anyone knows, please let us all know.
[Apr 29, 2012 11:40:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

You may want to type in ''reliable'' in the Help search box and see where you end up... which is right in the introduction of the article from which you snipped point 1.

As for who wrote the 3-4 day deadline (as the only unambiguous indicator), it will have been the undersigned who posted that. The formula is 40% of original [standard] deadline, which used to be like 20-25%, but then for Beta repairs that became so short a deadline, that they got missed, so it was upped to 40%. :D

--//--

edit: This 40% is not ''all'' applying. There are different calculations when for instance a host looses a task file and re-fetches it e.g. just before the original deadline. These get some shorter deadline to complete. After all, these hosts already allowed more than a week to say hello to WCG between fetching the task and connecting again. We've seen some exclamations of why such a short deadline was allowed [the RS page rewrites the assignment date to confuse the matter]... which now further will add to some doing head-scratching, but that is without me as I don't think is to be of any large importance. My hosts are managed so that tasks are on average returned within 48 hours, are 99.99% valid, ergo I ''trust'' them to be and remain ''reliable'' ;P

edit2: ''48 hours'', not ''48 ours''
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 29, 2012 12:27:04 PM]
[Apr 29, 2012 12:18:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher
Norway
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 974
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Trusted Computer?

Whilst the word "Trusted" was used [to follow the OP term], there is no such definition in BOINC world that I can find [but maybe in the developer documentation].

The info about "Adaptive Replicaton" does mention "trust", but the info at the very beginning also mentions "reliable" so easy to be confused. Also, the info haven't been updates with the server-changes so is now incorrect.

Going directly to the source-code on the other hand clearly shows "trusted" is being used and it's not the same as "reliable". As mentioned earlier in the thread, the limits for how many consecutive valid doesn't need to be the same for "trusted" or "reliable", this was just my assumption due to the very low limit now for being "reliable". With the old server-code if not mis-remembers WCG used 20 or something for "trusted" while "reliable" was roughly 70.


In any case, if you know the limit for consecutive valid, to know for which application/plan-classes a computer is "trusted", just look on the "Application details for host ###"-page...

... Well, it would have been this way, if WCG hadn't "forgot" to upgrade the web-part of the code that is...


lawrencehardin wrote:
So all 'reliable' computers are 'trusted' but some 'trusted' computers have larger caches than 'reliable' computers do.

A good description of things. cool
----------------------------------------


"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Ingleside at Apr 29, 2012 2:15:59 PM]
[Apr 29, 2012 2:11:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 32   Pages: 4   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread