| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Chat Room
Thread: Stats are crazy lately |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 8
|
|
| Author |
|
|
RicktheBrick
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 23, 2005 Post Count: 206 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Stats are definitely not right. On one day I had 287 results and 46 days of cpu time which is by no means possible. Yesterday I had around 190 results in the morning but had only 206 results at night. In the morning I get less results since I have less computers working than I do during the day. The only thing I can figure out is somehow on a given day some results are temporarily lost and are added in on a later date.
|
||
|
|
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher The Great State of Texas Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 1054 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
The only thing I can figure out is somehow on a given day some results are temporarily lost and are added in on a later date. I do think they are added when they validate.    |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3010 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Which projects are you crunching?, as some (i.e. Zero Redundancy) projects validate a lot quicker than others (i.e., HPF2) - and it may be those that are having to go through the Pending Validation stage, which are causing your Stats to go haywire...
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Yes, at least for C4CW the results are counted when they're validated (from my experience). Also there was the validator issue that was corrected that caused the exact high counts you're explaining, once everything got caught up.
---------------------------------------- i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello RicktheBrick,
This is one of the basic differences between the old UD system and BOINC. UD would award points immediately upon receiving the result while BOINC awards credit only after validation. People really noticed how choppy and uneven this seemed when we were switching over to BOINC. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
For feedback purposes: for my stats, the userAverage curve as displayed by my BOINC_v6.12.34 peaked at 2012.03.20Tu having continued the upward trend since 2012.02.25Sa. Since that peak, my userAverage is on a downward trend and continues to this day. My doneWUs has always been in a 2-party quorum for VINA-based projects (SN2S at the latest) for the period mentioned and no hardware/software changes on my end, nor a change in machine operating parameters/times either.
; |
||
|
|
RicktheBrick
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 23, 2005 Post Count: 206 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
In early April I had over a thousand results in 5 days. Now I can hardly get 500 results in 5 days. I have not changed how much my computers are working but my results are cut in half. So what changed?
|
||
|
|
petehardy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 4, 2007 Post Count: 318 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
In early April I had over a thousand results in 5 days. Now I can hardly get 500 results in 5 days. I have not changed how much my computers are working but my results are cut in half. So what changed? This looks normal. Perhaps you're running longer WUs.  "Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it! |
||
|
|
|