| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 17
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Am I the only one whose CEP2 WUs upload have suddenly dropped in size by half? No errors, invalids, or inconclusive. Have had quite a.few (20+) that r finishing quick and uploading 15 mb compared to 33-36 mb recently. Just curious.
Running Linux, and there was an update recently, but I've had several others on a Windows rig do the same. I've checked the results, and nothing is out of the ordinary (no premature exits). |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Sometimes there are some batches that are much quicker.
----------------------------------------It has something to do about the molecules being smaller thus needing less CPU time. That being said, it's normal. ![]() - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thx for the reply. For some reason I didn't even consider smaller molecules. Lol
Crunching on... |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Out of interest how long did your 20+ tasks run for & how many Jobs from the tasks were completed?
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
marvey11
Advanced Cruncher Germany Joined: Apr 2, 2011 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
5pot,
----------------------------------------that's all easily explained. Have a look at the names of the tasks you're currently crunching. Some of mine were E205679_292_C.19.C14H8N2OSSe.01423013.4.set1d06_0 E205678_999_C.20.C14H8N4S2.01405105.0.set1d06_0 E205687_139_C.20.C16H9NOS2.01364512.0.set1d06_0 The part marked in bold is what's -- more or less -- signifying the size of the work unit. Only a few days ago that number was at around 31 or 32. So, for the first time I'm seeing CEP2 jobs do a complete run and finish in a lot less than 12 hours. So, no worries ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
E205679_292_C.19.C14H8N2OSSe.01423013.4.set1d06_0 E205678_999_C.20.C14H8N4S2.01405105.0.set1d06_0 E205687_139_C.20.C16H9NOS2.01364512.0.set1d06_0 ![]() How do you read the bold numbering, as in how dose it determine job run time? ![]() |
||
|
|
marvey11
Advanced Cruncher Germany Joined: Apr 2, 2011 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
How do you read the bold numbering, as in how dose it determine job run time? Not in absolute terms. It's just an indication of the molecule size as Falconet explained above. And smaller molecules will in all probability result in shorter run times. ![]() |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
How do you read the bold numbering, as in how dose it determine job run time? Not in absolute terms. It's just an indication of the molecule size as Falconet explained above. And smaller molecules will in all probability result in shorter run times. Thankyou for your answer. ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Some samples of early January [thanks to BOINCTasks history]
----------------------------------------World Community Grid 6.40 cep2 E204968_118_C.31.C26H13NO2SSe.00724879.3.set1d06_0 09:08:46 (08:50:25) 4-1-2012 7:38:00 4-1-2012 7:45:30 Reported: OK * World Community Grid 6.40 cep2 E204968_111_C.31.C24H13N5SSe.00564626.3.set1d06_0 08:18:10 (08:00:59) 4-1-2012 6:49:54 4-1-2012 7:02:28 Reported: OK * World Community Grid 6.40 cep2 E204992_593_A.30.C26H18OS2Si.258.1.set1d06_0 08:35:20 (07:19:31) 5-1-2012 19:04:10 5-1-2012 19:18:17 Reported: OK * World Community Grid 6.40 cep2 E204992_725_A.29.C22H12S4Se2Si.146.3.set1d06_0 08:21:14 (07:07:48) 5-1-2012 18:46:29 5-1-2012 19:02:05 Reported: OK At any rate, look at the project crunching chart or http://bit.ly/WCGART to see the change in daily average runtime... it plummeted. If I'd plot the curve over a longer period, you'd see this gradual increases, then a fall and a resume of the slow rise... in fact, the new computer that runs the charts is much more powerful, so lengthened the charts from last 3 months to last 6 months for the occasion. [looks a bit crammed though]. The mean times actually started falling right around when switching from quorum 2 to Zero Redundancy... possibly quite a few slower machines got off the bandwagon at that time [wild guess]. --//-- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 5, 2012 10:30:37 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Speedy51,
I'm averaging 115-130 right now which is about an hour less than usual for my quickest machine. |
||
|
|
|