Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2695 times and has 5 replies Next Thread
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
DSFL Updated to version 6.24

DSFL application has been updated to 6.24. This is the version that was last tested in beta with the check point issue changes.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Jan 3, 2012 6:42:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DSFL Updated to version 6.24

Based on share and production numbers with this new version, I'm deriving that the old bug -195 too has been largely gotten rid off and status for DSFL is now "Normal" in the feeders, as I've just inputted into the Dashboard. Some members may want to have this confirmed who previously deselected this science for this reason.

Now the only thing left to fix v.v. all uncompleted sciences is the flow of DDDT2. ;P

--//--
[Jan 7, 2012 9:43:59 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DSFL Updated to version 6.24

So, are all the WU's processed by 619 that get compared to results from 624 going to be classified as "invalid" ?

That's what it looks like in Results Status at this location.
[Jan 10, 2012 2:09:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DSFL Updated to version 6.24

So, are all the WU's processed by 619 that get compared to results from 624 going to be classified as "invalid" ?

That's what it looks like in Results Status at this location.


Same here.

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jan 10, 2012 3:33:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DSFL Updated to version 6.24

I saw that too. I thought that BOINC had a mechanism to make sure that the same (old) code version was used to process a re-send, but it looks like I'm wrong. Still, it's not like it's an avalanche of failures. Everything processed correctly in the end, just a few extra cycles used and a few points lost.
[Jan 10, 2012 1:10:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DSFL Updated to version 6.24

Version 7 of BOINC and the new server software will have that skill at the very least. In past, if incompatibilities were determined from old to new science app version results, the feeder was run dry [major interruption] before releasing a new version, so here's waiting on that upgrade WIP being put in place.

--//--
[Jan 10, 2012 1:28:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread