Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 20
Posts: 20   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2161 times and has 19 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Would like to get at least one for my IBM R40 laptop that I've had some stuck WUs on, but can't seem to get any BETA WUs. I've up'd the cache, nothing. Got two production GFAM WUs in my local cache already I haven't processed yet, don't want to abort them to clean my cache. I'll keep clicking ... Update ... Update ... Update ...

I'm guessing they are already gone...I missed out crying
[Dec 16, 2011 5:35:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Well, my quad netted a few with more jobs, and with WtD set to 30 minutes, none write earlier, but the stderr.txt file shows multiple jobs completed in that time... think this is an early thumbs up.

--//--

INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[17:39:52] Number of tasks = 64
[17:39:52] Starting task 0,CPU time is 0.000000.
[17:39:52] ./ZINC25727625.pdbqt size = 22 6 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[17:44:10] Finished task #0 cpu time used 249.371584
[17:44:10] Starting task 1,CPU time is 249.371584.
[17:44:10] ./ZINC25727625.pdbqt size = 22 6 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[17:48:27] Finished task #1 cpu time used 247.675478
[17:48:27] Starting task 2,CPU time is 497.047062.
[17:48:27] ./ZINC25727625.pdbqt size = 22 6 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[17:52:49] Finished task #2 cpu time used 253.463840
[17:52:49] Starting task 3,CPU time is 750.510902.
[17:52:49] ./ZINC25727625.pdbqt size = 22 6 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[17:57:09] Finished task #3 cpu time used 249.827613
[17:57:09] Starting task 4,CPU time is 1000.338515.
[17:57:09] ./ZINC25758835.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:02:49] Finished task #4 cpu time used 328.604536
[18:02:49] Starting task 5,CPU time is 1328.943051.
[18:02:49] ./ZINC25758835.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:08:32] Finished task #5 cpu time used 335.184947
[18:08:32] Starting task 6,CPU time is 1664.127998.
[18:08:32] ./ZINC25758835.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:14:14] Finished task #6 cpu time used 335.716981
[18:14:14] Starting task 7,CPU time is 1999.844979.
[18:14:14] ./ZINC25758835.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:19:49] Finished task #7 cpu time used 329.480591
[18:19:49] Starting task 8,CPU time is 2329.325570.
[18:19:49] ./ZINC25758838.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:25:31] Finished task #8 cpu time used 332.948808
[18:25:31] Starting task 9,CPU time is 2662.274378.
[18:25:31] ./ZINC25758838.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:31:19] Finished task #9 cpu time used 335.552970
[18:31:19] Starting task 10,CPU time is 2997.827348.
[18:31:19] ./ZINC25758838.pdbqt size = 27 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[Dec 16, 2011 5:39:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Hypernova
Master Cruncher
Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Post Count: 1908
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Caught 25 WU --> 16 GFAM Beta and 9 DFSL Beta.
If they all Validate in two or three days with 4 to 5 hours then the gold badge should be secured. praying praying praying
----------------------------------------

[Dec 16, 2011 7:58:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Monster WU shows 2.9 % progress after 4 CPU hours. If all jobs are equally long, this will take at least 5.5 days to finish.

INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[16:36:42] Number of tasks = 88
[16:36:42] Starting task 0,CPU time is 0.000000.
[16:36:42] ./ZINC34878606.pdbqt size = 38 10 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[18:16:38] Vina exited normal 0.
[18:16:38] Finished task #0 cpu time used 5471.735075
[18:16:38] Starting task 1,CPU time is 5471.735075.
[18:16:38] ./ZINC34878606.pdbqt size = 38 10 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[19:49:16] Vina exited normal 0.
[19:49:16] Finished task #1 cpu time used 5476.009502
[19:49:16] Starting task 2,CPU time is 10947.744577.
[19:49:16] ./ZINC34878606.pdbqt size = 38 10 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta15.x1kmvHumanDHFRdry.pdbqt size = 1843 0
[Dec 16, 2011 7:59:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Only got 2 BETA_ GFAM. Both ran fine on Linux and finished just under 7 hours. (6.75 & 6.90)
I always seem to get only 1 or 2 Beta's each round.
I guess it's because I keep a 0.0 day work buffer.
I kinda wish the Beta's would just ignore work buffer settings and dump them to me anyway. wink

Oh well only 10 days worth of Beta's till my Bronze Badge...
[Dec 17, 2011 9:14:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

I got two GFAM betas, but I don't think I'm much help. I was out all day yesterday and didn't know I had them so didn't turn on checkpoint debugging. They ran fine on an AMD Phenom II under Linux, 6.82 and 7.07 hours, and have validated.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 17, 2011 1:54:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TPCBF
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Post Count: 1928
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Picked up one WU on a "remote" host, which I only noticed when it showed as pending validation.
Finished in 12.49h, seemed to be in the same ballpark range as usual GFAM WUs, never...

Ralf
----------------------------------------

[Dec 18, 2011 3:40:07 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nasher
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 2, 2005
Post Count: 1422
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

I did GREAT on this load of beta's managed to get over 3 days worth... less than 10 more sill silver beta... oh well maybe by 2013....
----------------------------------------

[Dec 18, 2011 5:12:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Went through various result logs [speaking of both DSFL and GFAM in this double test] and put them against the message log to see if any had violated the client checkpoint save setting of 30 minutes. As per me "early thumbs up", none did, recording multiple jobs and then saving on the next job completion when 30 minutes had passed. In short, they behaved as the doctor prescribed; Ready to move to production on the checkpoint count. :D

BETA_ GFAM_ x1kmvHumanDHFRdry_ 0001624_ 0078_ 0-- 95711 Valid 12/16/11 16:13:44 12/18/11 00:26:23 15.33 155.8 / 153.6
BETA_ DSFL_ 00000084_ 0000000_ 0678_ 0-- 1767290 Valid 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 17:45:31 4.28 119.5 / 122.2
BETA_ DSFL_ 00000084_ 0000000_ 0774_ 0-- 1767290 Valid 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 17:39:36 4.38 121.2 / 122.6
BETA_ DSFL_ 00000084_ 0000000_ 0717_ 0-- 1767290 Valid 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 17:31:49 4.19 114.4 / 110.1
BETA_ GFAM_ x1kmvHumanDHFRdry_ 0001507_ 0395_ 0-- 1767290 Pending Validation 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 14:23:53 7.06 187.0 / 0.0
BETA_ DSFL_ 00000084_ 0000000_ 0784_ 0-- 1767290 Valid 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 11:29:03 4.23 107.8 / 108.5
BETA_ GFAM_ x1kmvHumanDHFRdry_ 0001624_ 0503_ 2-- 95711 Valid 12/16/11 16:18:20 12/17/11 07:39:05 14.58 148.2 / 175.5
BETA_ GFAM_ x1kmvHumanDHFRdry_ 0001507_ 0614_ 0-- 1767290 Valid 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 00:19:52 7.55 190.7 / 157.1 **
BETA_ GFAM_ x1kmvHumanDHFRdry_ 0001507_ 0500_ 0-- 1767290 Valid 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/17/11 00:10:34 7.24 182.8 / 185.5
BETA_ GFAM_ x1kmvHumanDHFRdry_ 0001507_ 0466_ 0-- 1767290 Pending Validation 12/16/11 15:37:17 12/16/11 23:55:46 7.17 180.9 / 0.0

** already migrated off RS page on second refresh i.e. someone is probably checking already. :D

--//--
[Dec 18, 2011 4:29:24 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Test for GFAM Dec 16 2011 (Discussion Thread)

Here's a quick performance table of the betas i received:

Computer 1:
2 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-53 [Family 15 Model 104 Stepping 1]
Vista 32-bit, Boinc 6.10.60 32-bit

2 DSFL tasks, average run time: 10.76 hours
2 GFAM tasks, average run time: 16.85 hours

Computer 2:
8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 740 @ 1.73GHz [Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5]
Win 7 64-bit, Boinc 6.10.60 64-bit

8 DSFL tasks, average run time: 17.52 hours
*8 GFAM tasks, average run time: 27.87 hours

* 4 tasks still in progress, have about the same run time

Just a little curious why my oldie crunched the jobs notably faster than my newer machine. Wingmen of computer 2 were 2-3 times faster.

Good thing: This will bring a gold badge :-)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Dec 18, 2011 4:49:01 PM]
[Dec 18, 2011 4:48:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 20   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread