| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: WOW! Thatsa lotta points |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 11
|
|
| Author |
|
|
pirogue
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 685 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
While updating my stats, I got an exception. Upon tracking down the offending WU, I saw this:
----------------------------------------E202794_ 551_ C.27.C22H13N3OS.00380714.3.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Valid 7/28/11 17:56:05 7/29/11 02:35:14 7.56 220.3 / 2,678.0 <--mine E202794_ 551_ C.27.C22H13N3OS.00380714.3.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Valid 7/28/11 17:29:54 7/30/11 19:57:01 12.00 4,493.7 / 2,343.2 It turns out that I apparently haven't received more than 1,000 points for a WU in at least 6 months. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
prioque,
----------------------------------------We just came back, watching Trofeo Matteotti from the boardwalk [cycling], and let your new 1.11c run and see that lots of credit went funky. The claim on your wingman is... hmmm. knreed is aware of these excursions, but has not found what sets it off. What odds me is that the claimed/granted credit in the program is not agreeing with what's shown as granted on the RS pages... points and credits maybe getting mixed up or the comma / point decimal getting misread? sample: dg01_ d425_ pr45a1_ 1-- DDDT2 1479931 Valid 31-7-2011 17:20:00 31-7-2011 14:46:55 46,71 1.148,0 579,0 4,60 125,87 Ubuntu 11.04 Q6600 2400 25-7-2011 12:04:29 dg01_ d424_ pr91b1_ 1-- DDDT2 1479931 Valid 31-7-2011 17:20:00 31-7-2011 13:33:53 45,51 1.144,0 1.056,0 4,73 223,26 Ubuntu 11.04 Q6600 2400 25-7-2011 12:03:10 quorum of first WU: dg01_ d425_ pr45a1_ 0-- 640 Valid 7/25/11 12:04:34 7/25/11 18:38:46 4.05 57.9 / 57.9 dg01_ d425_ pr45a1_ 1-- 640 Valid 7/25/11 12:04:29 7/31/11 14:46:55 4.60 114.8 / 57.9 < moi quorum of second WU: dg01_ d424_ pr91b1_ 0-- 640 Valid 7/25/11 12:03:11 7/29/11 06:36:36 2.90 96.7 / 105.6 dg01_ d424_ pr91b1_ 1-- 640 Valid 7/25/11 12:03:10 7/31/11 13:33:53 4.73 114.4 / 105.6 < moi --//-- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 31, 2011 3:38:12 PM] |
||
|
|
pirogue
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 685 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It looks like I messed up the decimal when I changed the thousands separator. 1.1d is now out.
----------------------------------------You should be able to go back to the previous version of the database by renaming workunits.dat and workunits.idx to something else, and then renaming workunits.dbk and workunits.ibk to workunits.dat and workunits.idx. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
It looks like I messed up the decimal when I changed the thousands separator Bummer. I thought blowing the dirt out of my CPU cooler had really kicked that system into gear.  |
|||
|
||||
|
Rickjb
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Sep 17, 2006 Post Count: 666 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
CPU_Time Claimed / Granted
7.56 220.3 / 2,678.0 <--mine (pirogue's) 12.00 4,493.7 / 2,343.2 Wow! These guys hit the jackpot there! I thought that in awarding of credits for quorum-of-2 projects there was a system that overrides the use of using a simple average in cases where one of the claims is outrageous, as in pirogue's wingman's claim above. This is apparently not the case with CEP2. Is a change to this on the to-do list, or is that list getting to be too long for the WCG servers to hold it? :( |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
quoting myself from this thread:
hmmm. knreed is aware of these excursions, but has not found what sets it off. |
||
|
|
Elfo
Cruncher SPAIN Joined: Dec 31, 2008 Post Count: 32 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
New Record !!!! ;-)
----------------------------------------Nombre del Proyecto: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 Creado: 08/21/2011 16:05:24 Nombre: E203010_251_C.27.C22H12S4Si.00233778.4.set1d06 Quórum Mínimo: 2 Réplica: 2 E203010_ 251_ C.27.C22H12S4Si.00233778.4.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Válido 22/08/11 23:14:27 25/08/11 08:37:01 10,90 144,7 / 8.153,5 ----> MINE E203010_ 251_ C.27.C22H12S4Si.00233778.4.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Válido 22/08/11 22:53:55 24/08/11 12:57:50 12,00 3.030,4 / 1.528,8
Join my team "Naked for the World" http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=82WC2KZC7V1
|
||
|
|
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 748 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I got one of those too!!!
----------------------------------------E203034_ 865_ C.26.C21H13NS2SeSi.00446548.3.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Valid 8/25/11 21:41:59 8/26/11 03:49:25 2.19 623.1 / 323.8 E203034_ 865_ C.26.C21H13NS2SeSi.00446548.3.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Valid 8/25/11 21:29:57 8/26/11 08:49:44 6.35 130.8 / 1,726.9 Don't know if this had anything to do with the weird points computation, but participant #1 got "Application exited with RC = 0x1" in task #2, and skipped the rest of the tasks. Unfortunately there's not many things you can do with the points. Now, if these were free airlines miles, that would be something.  [Edit 1 times, last edit by littlepeaks at Aug 27, 2011 3:33:32 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I nearly got one!
---------------------------------------- E203043_ 129_ C.27.C21H11NO2SSeSi.00285103.1.set1d06_ 2-- - In Progress 28/08/11 00:15:07 01/09/11 00:15:07 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 E203043_ 129_ C.27.C21H11NO2SSeSi.00285103.1.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Inconclusive 26/08/11 22:06:36 28/08/11 00:06:26 12.00 3,508.1 / 0.0 E203043_ 129_ C.27.C21H11NO2SSeSi.00285103.1.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Inconclusive 26/08/11 21:34:43 27/08/11 19:38:00 10.60 264.9 / 0.0<mine unusual log for my wingman crunches upto job 4 the rest skipped until jobs 12 and 13 completed. Result Log Result Name: E203043_ 129_ C.27.C21H11NO2SSeSi.00285103.1.set1d06_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [16:19:32] Number of jobs = 16 [16:19:32] Starting job 0,CPU time has been restored to 0.000000. [21:38:03] Finished Job #0 [21:38:03] Starting job 1,CPU time has been restored to 464.359375. [22:02:10] Finished Job #1 [22:02:10] Starting job 2,CPU time has been restored to 1841.453125. [06:30:20] Finished Job #2 [06:30:20] Starting job 3,CPU time has been restored to 31293.812500. [07:01:16] Finished Job #3 [07:01:16] Starting job 4,CPU time has been restored to 32967.984375. Application exited with RC = 0xc0000005 [07:04:13] Finished Job #4 [07:04:13] Starting job 5,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #5 [07:04:13] Starting job 6,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #6 [07:04:13] Starting job 7,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #7 [07:04:13] Starting job 8,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #8 [07:04:13] Starting job 9,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #9 [07:04:13] Starting job 10,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #10 [07:04:13] Starting job 11,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [07:04:13] Skipping Job #11 [07:04:13] Starting job 12,CPU time has been restored to 33141.203125. [09:45:31] Finished Job #12 [09:45:31] Starting job 13,CPU time has been restored to 42600.250000. Killing job because cpu time has been exceeded. Subjob start time = 0, Subjob current time = 1088736520 [09:55:45] Finished Job #13 09:55:57 (1152): called boinc_finish be interesting to see who gets what here if it is just a credit issue making these inconclusive,I stick it on record that i have absolutely no problem at all in accepting inflated credits  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 28, 2011 9:02:16 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I got one of those too!!! E203034_ 865_ C.26.C21H13NS2SeSi.00446548.3.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Valid 8/25/11 21:41:59 8/26/11 03:49:25 2.19 623.1 / 323.8 E203034_ 865_ C.26.C21H13NS2SeSi.00446548.3.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Valid 8/25/11 21:29:57 8/26/11 08:49:44 6.35 130.8 / 1,726.9 Don't know if this had anything to do with the weird points computation, but participant #1 got "Application exited with RC = 0x1" in task #2, and skipped the rest of the tasks. Unfortunately there's not many things you can do with the points. Now, if these were free airlines miles, that would be something. The origins in the riddle are probably the outrages claim of 623.1 credit on 2.19 hours and the 'outlier' checks falling over, somehow, still. Not revealed if the 2.19 hour task really did 2.19 hours or suffered CPU time loss. As to the claim, well, may not necessarily be the original claim... honesty best policy, not thinking that the techs will do a retro-correction so ... parteé :D --//-- |
||
|
|
|