Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
![]() |
Author |
|
cw64
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Oct 6, 2007 Post Count: 120 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was wondering if the main reason there is such little resistance is down to water adhesion? Specifically the (complete?) lack of it against a carbon structure with high levels of isotropy. Such carbon structures would have very little potential to allow adhesion to occur.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
You are right about your comments on the carbon nanotubes. They are generally hydrophobic. I would say that the lack of adhesion (i.e. hydrophobicity) on the CNT walls is part of the reason for improved flow through them. The other reason is that the structure of the water also changes due to the size of the pore. Because the pore is so small, the water will form hydrogen bonds inside the tube, decreasing the disorder of the flow and therefore also the resistance. Both these effects play an important part.
|
||
|
cw64
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Oct 6, 2007 Post Count: 120 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In that case there may be significant savings to be made in general water pumping. Lining pipes with carbon would reduce drag, and the power needed to pump.
----------------------------------------I'm sure there would be obstacles to accomplish this, but even a simple covering of carbon fibre could yield big results. ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |