Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 11
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4274 times and has 10 replies Next Thread
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1460
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
applause Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~nbard/WCGStats/

Statistics updated on 2011 February 4th : 56.83%
----------------------------------------
[Feb 4, 2011 12:36:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 3010
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

Thanks for the update - although after looking at the Positions of Batches chart, that doesn't look as though it's correct. Basically, I've pulled down quite a few batches in the 1400's series (last lot, were from batch # 1435), yet on that graph it's showing that we've just begun processing ~batch # 1325...
----------------------------------------

[Feb 4, 2011 12:51:24 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

Great. Considering the ''received' and indexed'' charts at http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~nbard/WCGStats/ and my queue showing children of 1385+1425, there's probably a good 1%+ more of completed tasks on the WCG servers subject to confirmation. As of noon we net:

Per WCG stats: 33788665 (Total tasks validated / 2.06)
Net Per Nico_B: 33088783
Completed Backlog: 699882

The current daily average is about 131,000 (quorum 2)

Wonder if WCG could add the net assimilated tasks counter to the Project Statistics pages, if they do keep track of that. For some sciences where volume is known this would work as a good base to approximate progress (allowing to derive the relative error rate :O)

--//--
[Feb 4, 2011 1:15:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1460
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

SekeRob , do you have the HCMD2 projected completion date calculated ? (using current speed and this update info)
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by rilian at Feb 4, 2011 1:20:03 PM]
[Feb 4, 2011 1:19:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

My abacus makes it late Q2-2012, Spring Break and Summer Holiday effects inclusive. This indicator has not moved for quite a few months, hard entered May 31, and computed May 29, subject to change without notice of course :O)
[Feb 4, 2011 1:23:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1460
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

My abacus makes it late Q2-2012, Spring Break and Summer Holiday effects inclusive. This indicator has not moved for quite a few months, hard entered May 31, and computed May 29, subject to change without notice of course :O)

thank you for info :), you have good and useful abacus :)
----------------------------------------
[Feb 4, 2011 5:17:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ngmwcg
Cruncher
Joined: Jan 2, 2010
Post Count: 18
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smile Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

Hey, it would be great if the BOINC client showed this status. That way contributors could watch the progress in near real time rather than having to wait for updates on the forums. It would also take the burden off the researchers to manually update us.

Just a suggestion.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by ngmwcg at Apr 28, 2011 6:33:02 PM]
[Apr 28, 2011 6:32:24 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

A good suggestion, but...
Ah, never mind the buts, it's a good suggestion; crunchers want to know their participation is leading to progress and when there is conclusion...
- Statistics updated on 2011 April 15th : 68.35%
- So we should now be at about 70% complete
[Apr 29, 2011 12:07:51 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

A good suggestion, but...
Ah, never mind the buts, it's a good suggestion; crunchers want to know their participation is leading to progress and when there is conclusion...
- Statistics updated on 2011 April 15th : 68.35%
- So we should now be at about 70% complete

"A good suggestion" you say so you will have thought out the mechanics how to get the information from the different WCG project scientist groups, not only at WCG, into the BOINC Manager, for that is being suggested? If you have, would you please write it up and then submit the discussion document to Berkeley. Maybe a mechanism that submits "progress" to the up and coming Notices section of BOINC v 6.12? Of course, everyone would have to upgrade their client.

nmgwcg,

The project owners are responsible for giving updates on the progress and that you'll find for most through links on the respective research pages such as http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/research/cep2/overview.do which leads to http://cleanenergy.harvard.edu/index.php?ira=...debar&sidebar=science , which as it happens for practical purposes is collected for the members on a single sheet which is stickied in a post at top of the Start Here forum. It is "best estimate" as there are too many ''variables'' in the equation, such as the % shown at the HCMD2 progress page being weeks behind what we've processed at WCG. Go http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=18277 and click on the "Active/Intermittent Research Dashboard" link for an "all in one" view of many metrics.

cheers

--//--

edit: If you bookmark the last link, you'll never have to search again :-)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 29, 2011 6:11:32 AM]
[Apr 29, 2011 5:54:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Somervillejudson@netscape.net
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: May 16, 2008
Post Count: 1065
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Progress update 4 feb 2011 - 56.83%

Sekerob, why isn't WCG perfect, just wondering? Oh by the way could you teach me computer programming by tomorrow? Not making fun of anyone but myself, so if anyone is about to be upset, if you knew me, which is difficult, you would not be. Despite that many seem to become easily offended, which I attribute to their insecurity, which is really ashame, and not anything I purposefully do! At least try not to do! Complex world, thank God, but makes understanding not so easy!
[May 1, 2011 3:47:11 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread