| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum
Thread: Computing for Clean Water ver 6.14 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 21
|
|
| Author |
|
|
joeperry39@gmail.com
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 22, 2006 Post Count: 140 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
So far, the estimated times for the 6.14 WUs I'm getting are as long, or longer, than the estimates for the remaining 6.13 WUs that are already queued up.
----------------------------------------I've also noticed as we went from the 300s to the 4, 5, 6 and 700s that the times seem to keep getting longer.   "Everything in moderation, including moderation" -- Mark Twain |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
From what I am seeing soi far (with 66.6% complete with my 6.14 unit - it is about the same time with new work unit as it used to run under target02 target03 work units run longer than target02 in general. This application change to 6.14 would have made target02 run shorter than they did as well. Each target is going to have a different runtime compared to others. Also, the estimation for the work unit runtime length will adjust in a few days as more results from version 6.14 start coming in. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Mine are all running about 2 - 3 hours shorter good job uplinger
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Dec 30, 2010 2:23:02 AM] |
||
|
|
bieberj
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Dec 2, 2004 Post Count: 406 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
From what I am seeing soi far (with 66.6% complete with my 6.14 unit - it is about the same time with new work unit as it used to run under target02 target03 work units run longer than target02 in general. This application change to 6.14 would have made target02 run shorter than they did as well. Each target is going to have a different runtime compared to others. Also, the estimation for the work unit runtime length will adjust in a few days as more results from version 6.14 start coming in. Thanks, -Uplinger Pardon my typos... 3 work units completed in just under 4 hours - similar to the target02 work units. Glad you are getting more science in the same amount of time. Would be nice to get more credit  but we are not here for credits - we are here to help humanity. I am happy to get the same amount of credit as I have been getting before. |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Will there be updated mac and linux version too?
|
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
No updated mac and linux at this time. Windows was the slower version which caused us to re-evaluate the compile options used on Windows.
Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My WU are longer, but not too much; from 5.30h to above 6.00.
|
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My WU are longer, but not too much; from 5.30h to above 6.00. Interesting what speed is your CPU? I have a Intel 980X @ 3.33 without HT 03_0294 tasks take around 2 hours 41 minutes  |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Speedy,
----------------------------------------Strongly suggest using HT, they say it gets 8 to 25 percent more done depending on what your crunching! Not to mention, double the run time  |
||
|
|
Somervillejudson@netscape.net
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 16, 2008 Post Count: 1065 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Perhaps dumb question but you can turn off HT?
|
||
|
|
|